2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage

Abstract: Key Points Question Do machine learning approaches improve the ability to predict clinical outcomes and disposition of children at emergency department triage? Findings In this prognostic study of a nationally representative sample of 52 037 emergency department visits by children, machine learning–based triage models had better discrimination ability for clinical outcomes and disposition compared with the conventional triage approaches, with a higher sensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
166
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
166
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That such a model can accurately predict hospitalization outcome suggests that SISA/SISAL could be expanded to undifferentiated febrile illness. The ability of machine learning models to predict hospital admission outcomes using only emergency department triage data lends support to expanding our approach to undifferentiated fever [34,35]. Of the suspected arboviral cases analyzed here, approximately 54% were confirmed as acute or recent DENV infection, 17% had acute CHIKV infection, and 29% were negative for DENV, CHIKV or ZIKV (based on analysis of subjects in 2014 and 2015) [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That such a model can accurately predict hospitalization outcome suggests that SISA/SISAL could be expanded to undifferentiated febrile illness. The ability of machine learning models to predict hospital admission outcomes using only emergency department triage data lends support to expanding our approach to undifferentiated fever [34,35]. Of the suspected arboviral cases analyzed here, approximately 54% were confirmed as acute or recent DENV infection, 17% had acute CHIKV infection, and 29% were negative for DENV, CHIKV or ZIKV (based on analysis of subjects in 2014 and 2015) [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Clinical applications of machine learning for arboviral illnesses, specifically, have included analysis of patient genomes for dengue prognosis [29], scanning of patient sera for DENV [30] or Zika diagnosis [31], thermal image scanning for detection of hemodynamic shock [32], analysis of body temperature patterns for diagnosis of undifferentiated fever etiology [33], and analysis of patient data for dengue fever diagnosis [27]. No studies have yet attempted to use machine learning for prediction of hospitalization among arboviral illness or undifferentiated fever patients, although it has been used to predict critical care and hospitalization outcomes based on emergency department triage data in children and adults [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable importance is a scaled measure with a maximum value of 100. 17 The R code used for this analysis is shown in online supplemental material 1.…”
Section: Statistical and Computational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forest has been validated in the realm of clinical research. 60 We synthesized this machine learning method with meta-regression to investigate our research question and account for missing data, study heterogeneity, and study bias. The purpose of meta-regression is to identify moderator influence on effect size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 The random forest algorithm then builds predictive classification decision trees from each bootstrap sample. The results of each individual tree are aggregated (termed bootstrap aggregating or bagging 60,62,63 ) to yield final predictions, which represent the classes with the greatest proportion of corresponding individual decision trees. In our study, random weights were assigned to random forests to increase the influence of higher quality (i.e., more precise) studies on predictive model building.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%