2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning–Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By simulating human learning processes to analyse data patterns, these algorithms have tremendous potential to uncover intricate relationships between variables and improve predictive accuracy (Liu et al., 2023). However, a recent systematic review and meta‐analysis found that while machine learning models perform well in predicting delirium, most of the studies associated with them have a high risk of bias (Xie et al., 2022). In order to apply these models to new patient populations and routine clinical settings, they must be thoroughly evaluated to reduce potential risks of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By simulating human learning processes to analyse data patterns, these algorithms have tremendous potential to uncover intricate relationships between variables and improve predictive accuracy (Liu et al., 2023). However, a recent systematic review and meta‐analysis found that while machine learning models perform well in predicting delirium, most of the studies associated with them have a high risk of bias (Xie et al., 2022). In order to apply these models to new patient populations and routine clinical settings, they must be thoroughly evaluated to reduce potential risks of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that while machine learning models perform well in predicting delirium, most of the studies associated with them have a high risk of bias (Xie et al, 2022). In order to apply these models to new patient populations and routine clinical settings, they must be thoroughly evaluated to reduce potential risks of bias.…”
Section: Ta B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDSS tools using machine learning algorithms have also been applied to the prediction of delirium [ 20 ], and to the prediction of depression among older adults [ 21 ]. Interestingly, a review in 2020 identified 35 articles studying the prediction of specific chronic diseases using AI in older people, with 9 studies claiming algorithm accuracy of at least 90% [ 5 ].…”
Section: Where Can Ai Provide the Most Benefit To The Care Of Older P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using either MA or ML need this data form to analyze. 1 2 3) Despite the promises, challenges persist in integrating MA and ML. Heterogeneities in study designs, data formats, data quality, and various ML models pose significant obstacles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%