2018
DOI: 10.1190/tle37060435.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning-based object detection in images for reservoir characterization: A case study of fracture detection in shales

Abstract: Imaging tools are widely used in the petroleum industry to investigate structural features of reservoir rocks directly at multiple scales. Quantitative image analysis is often used to determine various rock properties, but it requires significant time and effort, particularly to analyze a large number of samples. Automated object detection represents a potential solution to this efficiency problem. This method uses computers to efficiently provide quantitative information for thousands of images. Automated fra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After superpixel/regions were generated, each of these regions was treated as a homogeneous particle and was annotated to a corresponding class, which could be solved with the use of automatic machine learning classification algorithms such as random forest, 14 k‐nearest neighbours 14 or neural network 15 . However, machine learning algorithms require a large amount of training data/labelled data and to generate these data sets it is very time consuming, even with a state‐of‐the‐art manual labelling tool 16,17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After superpixel/regions were generated, each of these regions was treated as a homogeneous particle and was annotated to a corresponding class, which could be solved with the use of automatic machine learning classification algorithms such as random forest, 14 k‐nearest neighbours 14 or neural network 15 . However, machine learning algorithms require a large amount of training data/labelled data and to generate these data sets it is very time consuming, even with a state‐of‐the‐art manual labelling tool 16,17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, machine learning algorithms require a large amount of training data/labelled data and to generate these data sets it is very time consuming, even with a state-of-the-art manual labelling tool. 16,17 Results in Figure 2C and D compare the superpixels extracted by DT watershed as well as by the popular SLIC algorithm. 11 Both algorithms can capture most of the details in the background image.…”
Section: Bse and Edx Image Segmentation Using A Superpixel Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tian and Daigle presented a machine learning framework for the identification of fractures in scanning electron microscope (SEM) images from carbonate-rich shale and siliceous shale samples. The framework utilizes the tensor flow object-detection API to detect objects in images, and utilizes single-shot detector in combination with a mobile net model (Tian and Daigle, 2018). While the results are promising for the detection of fractures in SEM images, the same technique may not easily be applied to formation image logs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, human detection is a challenging task because everyone has their unique appearance, and the shape of humans can make thousands of gestures simultaneously [3]. In general, object detection and recognition technologies fall either within the machine learning-based approaches (or early methods) [4] or deep learning-based approaches (or modern methods) [5,6]. The early methods require relatively less computing power (No need for graphics processor units (GPUs) to work in real-time) than modern approaches [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%