2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gc011043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning‐Based New Earthquake Catalog Illuminates On‐Fault and Off‐Fault Seismicity Patterns at the Discovery Transform Fault, East Pacific Rise

Jianhua Gong,
Wenyuan Fan,
Ross Parnell‐Turner

Abstract: Oceanic transform faults connect spreading centers and are imprinted with previous tectonic events. However, their tectonic interactions are not well understood due to limited observations. The Discovery transform fault system at 4°S, East Pacific Rise (EPR), represents a young transform system, offering a unique opportunity to study the interplay between faulting and other tectonic events at an early phases of an oceanic transform system. Discovery regularly hosts M5–6 characteristic earthquakes, and the seaf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, deep-learning-based phase pickers/event detectors (e.g., Kriegerowski et al, 2019;Mousavi et al, 2020;Ross et al, 2018;Soto & Schurr, 2021; have been gaining increasing attention due to their picking accuracy being comparable to human analysts (Chai et al, 2020) and high efficiency. Their application has surged in recent years, including for delineating seismicity in fault zones, subduction zones, oceanic transform faults, and volcanoes (e.g., Chen et al, 2022;Garza-Girón et al, 2023;Gong et al, 2023;Jiang et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2023;Liu et al, 2024;Tan et al, 2021;Wilding et al, 2023;Zhang et al, 2024). However, it can be difficult to predict deep-learning models' performance for outof-distribution data that are not well represented by training data (Teney et al, 2022;Wenzel et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep-learning-based phase pickers/event detectors (e.g., Kriegerowski et al, 2019;Mousavi et al, 2020;Ross et al, 2018;Soto & Schurr, 2021; have been gaining increasing attention due to their picking accuracy being comparable to human analysts (Chai et al, 2020) and high efficiency. Their application has surged in recent years, including for delineating seismicity in fault zones, subduction zones, oceanic transform faults, and volcanoes (e.g., Chen et al, 2022;Garza-Girón et al, 2023;Gong et al, 2023;Jiang et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2023;Liu et al, 2024;Tan et al, 2021;Wilding et al, 2023;Zhang et al, 2024). However, it can be difficult to predict deep-learning models' performance for outof-distribution data that are not well represented by training data (Teney et al, 2022;Wenzel et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%