2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021ms002802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning‐Based Modeling of Vegetation Leaf Area Index and Gross Primary Productivity Across North America and Comparison With a Process‐Based Model

Abstract: Terrestrial vegetation, through a series of physiological and ecological processes such as radiative transfer, photosynthesis, respiration, and evapotranspiration, exchanges material and energy with the atmosphere, pedosphere, and the other spheres, and affects the interaction between the land surface and the atmosphere. Studying and modeling of the physiological and ecological processes of vegetation in response to climate and environmental changes help understand the interaction and degree of global climate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar strong correlations between LAI and GPP have also been found by other researchers (e.g. Qu et al 2018 ; Zhang et al 2021 ; Chen et al 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar strong correlations between LAI and GPP have also been found by other researchers (e.g. Qu et al 2018 ; Zhang et al 2021 ; Chen et al 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, a machine-learning model might discern relationships between certain features and NEP without any ecological justification. Conversely, vegetation ecological process models are constructed based on a profound understanding of plant growth, photosynthesis, and respiration processes [62,63]. Thus, their predictions typically have clear ecological and biophysical interpretations, which grants these models an advantage in explaining and understanding ecosystem processes.…”
Section: Integrating Machine Learning and Ecological Process Models F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIF‐based and ML‐based products are produced using emerging methods and have been widely used in recent years. However, the SIF‐based products are limited by the short time range and the spatial discontinuity of satellite observations (Frankenberg et al., 2014; Köhler et al., 2018), and the ML methods cannot explain the mechanism of the photosynthetic process and depend on the data used for the model training (Jung et al., 2011, 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). The process‐based products are based on models with solid biophysical mechanisms, but the massive inputs and parameter requirements usually result in an insufficient spatial resolution and poor accuracy for these products, such as the CLM5 and BIOME‐BGC products (Huang et al., 2011; Lawrence et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%