2023
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-Based Method for Predicting Compressive Strength of Concrete

Abstract: Accurate prediction of the compressive strength of concrete is of great significance to construction quality and progress. In order to understand the current research status in the concrete compressive strength prediction field, a bibliometric analysis of the relevant literature published in this field in the last decade was conducted first. The 3135 journal articles published from 2012 to 2021 in the Web of Science core database were used as the database, and the knowledge map was drawn with the help of the v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our predictive model for 28-days-compressive strength, trained with 19,294 data instances, achieved R 2 = 0.79 and RMSE = 5.1 MPa in a 10-fold-cross-validation. In the study outlined in [27], where 1030 sets of concrete compressive strength were analyzed using 5-fold-cross-validation, a R 2 = 0.9 and a RMSE = 4.8 MPa were obtained. Our predictive model, trained with a significantly larger dataset, achieved similar performance in RMSE but lower in R 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our predictive model for 28-days-compressive strength, trained with 19,294 data instances, achieved R 2 = 0.79 and RMSE = 5.1 MPa in a 10-fold-cross-validation. In the study outlined in [27], where 1030 sets of concrete compressive strength were analyzed using 5-fold-cross-validation, a R 2 = 0.9 and a RMSE = 4.8 MPa were obtained. Our predictive model, trained with a significantly larger dataset, achieved similar performance in RMSE but lower in R 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this in mind, the following performance goals for predictive models can be defined: for compressive strength, an MAE less than 10 MPa; for flexural strength, an MAE less than 1.2 MPa; and for slump estimation, an MAE less than 20 mm. The literature review allowed us to define performance goals, as in the case of compressive strength prediction, where [27] concludes that a model with R 2 = 0.92 has a high level of accuracy. However, we consider that the results of other research are not comparable to ours due to the number of samples used to train and evaluate the models; whereas most studies barely reach a thousand samples, our study contains more than 20,000.…”
Section: Business Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of developments in technology over the last several decades [29][30][31], the use of AI has become more widespread across almost all technical fields. Predictions of solar radiation data were made using a variety of artificial intelligence techniques, including support vector regression (SVR), kernel nearest neighbors (k-NNs), deep learning (DL), and ANNs [32,33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements re ect the level of linear correlation between the predicted and actual data values. (Li et al, 2023b). Generally, the predicted accuracy will be the highest value among models when its coe cient of determination R 2 value is near 1 (Badarloo, Kari, and Jafari, 2018).…”
Section: Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%