2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based image processing for on-line defect recognition in additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to most studies, the authors devised an ensemble algorithm comprising random forest (RF), classification and regression tree (CART), random vector functional link (RVFL), ridge regression (RR), support vector regression (SVR), and adaptive boosting (Adaboost) in their study which was found to have better prediction performance than the individual ones. Caggiano et al [58] proposed an ML approach for online fault detection (via image processing) to precisely identify defected components in selective laser melting (SLM). The deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithm developed in this study was able to characterize layer-wise images of the SLM process and thereby identify defects induced by process nonconformities with a classification accuracy as high at 99.4%.…”
Section: For Shop Floor Monitoring and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to most studies, the authors devised an ensemble algorithm comprising random forest (RF), classification and regression tree (CART), random vector functional link (RVFL), ridge regression (RR), support vector regression (SVR), and adaptive boosting (Adaboost) in their study which was found to have better prediction performance than the individual ones. Caggiano et al [58] proposed an ML approach for online fault detection (via image processing) to precisely identify defected components in selective laser melting (SLM). The deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithm developed in this study was able to characterize layer-wise images of the SLM process and thereby identify defects induced by process nonconformities with a classification accuracy as high at 99.4%.…”
Section: For Shop Floor Monitoring and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes have introduced some capabilities unparalleled by traditional manufacturing, as they realize custom-designed shape, complex features, and low materials consumptions provided by AM [1]. Laser metal deposition (LMD) is a form of AM which accomplishes the layer-by-layer fabrication of near net-shaped components by introducing a powder stream into a high-energy laser beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above parameters constantly affect the parts being formed. Some studies have focused on the process parameter selection and optimization of the performance of LMD parts, but the defect presence is still high compared to traditional manufacturing [1,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the levels of the governing factors, the process can be conducted either in Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) or Melting (SLM) mode [4]. Since many concurrent phenomena are in place and since LPBF is primarily aimed at industries with stringent standards, different methods of in-line monitoring are required and are currently under development [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%