2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21030839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-Learning Based Determination of Gait Events from Foot-Mounted Inertial Units

Abstract: A promising but still scarcely explored strategy for the estimation of gait parameters based on inertial sensors involves the adoption of machine learning techniques. However, existing approaches are reliable only for specific conditions, inertial measurements unit (IMU) placement on the body, protocols, or when combined with additional devices. In this paper, we tested an alternative gait-events estimation approach which is fully data-driven and does not rely on a priori models or assumptions. High-frequency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, in recent years, there have been new models that potentially reach better performance, such as applying the attention model in LSTM. Furthermore, several studies [35][36][37][38][39][40] have also been conducted on hybrid deep learning architecture in other fields. Thus, one could speculate that using such a new model could enhance performance, and might therefore be worth to evaluate in a future study.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, in recent years, there have been new models that potentially reach better performance, such as applying the attention model in LSTM. Furthermore, several studies [35][36][37][38][39][40] have also been conducted on hybrid deep learning architecture in other fields. Thus, one could speculate that using such a new model could enhance performance, and might therefore be worth to evaluate in a future study.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the detection of the events defining the beginning and the end of each landing phase was not implemented by using data directly from the IMUs, such as in Zago et al, (2021) [43], but it needed to be done via the data recorded by the force plates and processed with Visual3D (or an equivalent biomechanics software) afterwards.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution to overcome these challenges is to rely on machine learning algorithms that can be trained on event-labeled ground truth IMU data to detect gait events in another dataset. This method can improve accuracy and automate event detection procedures [ 14 , 15 ] but is dependent on sensor placement, orientation, and the selected IMU signal component [ 16 , 17 ]. The placement of an IMU sensor under the arch of the foot, within the sole of the shoe, achieved better gait event detection accuracy compared to other locations on the lower limb during running [ 18 ] and walking [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%