2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-based CPS for Clustering High throughput Machining Cycle Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsupervised learning solutions for CPS have been developed in Reference [52]. Focusing on monitoring the machine spindle during its operation in a CPS, multidimensional classification using ML clustering was developed.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learning-based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised learning solutions for CPS have been developed in Reference [52]. Focusing on monitoring the machine spindle during its operation in a CPS, multidimensional classification using ML clustering was developed.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learning-based Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the most optimum solution is found by comparing methods from given the best results. The area that appears on the graph as 'Other' contains performance metrics such as Model Correlation Coefficient [35], Software Product Quality Metrics (ISO / IEC 9126, 25041, 25051) [41], α−λ Metric [42] and Opinion of a Machining Expert [43]. To evaluate the performance of clustering algorithms, metrics that not sufficiently reliable are used such as homogeneity score, integrity score, V measurement, corrected Rand index, corrected mutual information, silhouette coefficient.…”
Section: Rq22: Which Methods Have Been Used To Determine the Predictive Maintenance Performance Achieved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of clustering algorithms, metrics that not sufficiently reliable are used such as homogeneity score, integrity score, V measurement, corrected Rand index, corrected mutual information, silhouette coefficient. In this case, as in [43], the results can be evaluated in the opinion of a machining expert. Another outstanding performance measurement criterion is the 'Compared Actual RUL and Estimated RUL' option.…”
Section: Rq22: Which Methods Have Been Used To Determine the Predictive Maintenance Performance Achieved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, K-mean variation has formed the basis of research aimed at improving refinery catalytic processes [23]. A very recent study [24] proposed the use of a cyber-physical system that uses actual data from a machining process. The objective is to evaluate the performance of a machine tool spindle during a high-performance machining operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%