2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Based Classification of Microsatellite Variation: An Effective Approach for Phylogeographic Characterization of Olive Populations

Abstract: Finding efficient analytical techniques is overwhelmingly turning into a bottleneck for the effectiveness of large biological data. Machine learning offers a novel and powerful tool to advance classification and modeling solutions in molecular biology. However, these methods have been less frequently used with empirical population genetics data. In this study, we developed a new combined approach of data analysis using microsatellite marker data from our previous studies of olive populations using machine lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data mining, also known as knowledge discovery, is a relatively new technique to extract useful knowledge from data (compared to traditional multivariate analysis) (Shekoofa et al 2014). The main strength of data mining resides in its ability to handle large data sets and to extract meaningful and easy-to-understand results, which is usually impossible by human calculations (Torkzaban et al 2015). A few studies have looked into this field to improve early detection techniques by novel data mining tools (Sharifi et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data mining, also known as knowledge discovery, is a relatively new technique to extract useful knowledge from data (compared to traditional multivariate analysis) (Shekoofa et al 2014). The main strength of data mining resides in its ability to handle large data sets and to extract meaningful and easy-to-understand results, which is usually impossible by human calculations (Torkzaban et al 2015). A few studies have looked into this field to improve early detection techniques by novel data mining tools (Sharifi et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, the development of more effective molecular markers has been promoted for genotyping purposes in several fruit crop species (Guo et al 2014;Jiao et al 2014;Sun et al 2015), and especially for the olive (Biton et al 2015;Dominguez-Garcia et al 2012;Kaya et al 2013;Torkzaban et al 2015). Despite the availability of a large set of molecular tools, olive fingerprinting still remains a difficult task, mainly due to the several weaknesses of most widely used markers (Bracci et al 2011) that include the lack of sequence information, the difficulties in distinguishing among alleles, and the impossibility to share data among labs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torkzaban et al () analyzed with a carefully selected group of 11 microsatellite markers 267 olive tree genotypes including reference cultivars, local ecotypes and wild olives from Iran as well as some widely employed Mediterranean varieties. As a first step, Torkzaban et al () conducted a feature selection in order to identify significant variables in the multidimensional data. For that they assessed a series of attribute weighting algorithms while searching for the most indicative predictor attributes (SSR marker alleles).…”
Section: Genetic Analyses Of Molecular Marker Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method Naive Bayes based on Bayes conditional probability rule is used for performing classification tasks. It was perfectly performed (90.98% correct classifications) in the application of phylogeographic characterization of olive tree populations in Iran on the basis of SSR markers (Torkzaban et al, ). The method operated in preprocessed data which were cleaned and subjected to selection of the most diagnostic alleles.…”
Section: Multivariate Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation