2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-based Algorithm Enables the Exclusion of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 23 , who performed prospective analysis of 1912 individuals and found ML-derived predictions to be superior to traditional atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk algorithm and CAC score. These predictive ML algorithms also predict obstructive CAD with a high degree of accuracy (AUC: 0.77; 24 sensitivity: 100 ± 0.0% and specificity 69.8 ± 3.6% 25 ). Automated identification of CAC score has been performed using k -nearest neighbour, CNN and gradient boosting ML with reasonably good accuracies (sensitivity: 73.8% and false positive rate: 0.1 errors per scan; 16 sensitivity: up to 72% and false positive rate: as low as 0.48 errors per scan; 18 and AUC: 0.67–0.85, 19 respectively).…”
Section: Applications Of Machine Learning In Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 23 , who performed prospective analysis of 1912 individuals and found ML-derived predictions to be superior to traditional atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk algorithm and CAC score. These predictive ML algorithms also predict obstructive CAD with a high degree of accuracy (AUC: 0.77; 24 sensitivity: 100 ± 0.0% and specificity 69.8 ± 3.6% 25 ). Automated identification of CAC score has been performed using k -nearest neighbour, CNN and gradient boosting ML with reasonably good accuracies (sensitivity: 73.8% and false positive rate: 0.1 errors per scan; 16 sensitivity: up to 72% and false positive rate: as low as 0.48 errors per scan; 18 and AUC: 0.67–0.85, 19 respectively).…”
Section: Applications Of Machine Learning In Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…CAC can be estimated semi-quantitatively using three methods: the mass equivalent score, the volume score and the most widely used Agatston score. All these scoring methods are strongly correlated with each other [ 4 ]. The CAC value by the Agatston method is calculated by multiplying the area of calcified plaque by the density score.…”
Section: Methods Of Cac Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data from coronary calcium score (CACS) scans were used to screen and predict the presence of obstructive CHD through the elaboration of a gradient boosting machine with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 69.8% and a negative predictive value of 100%. 61 Wang et al 62 investigated the accuracy of a DL algorithm versus the classical quantification of CACS reporting and agreement between the 2 approaches with a correlation coefficient of 0.77, thus providing a reliable method for cardiac risk stratification.…”
Section: Cacs Evaluation and Coronary Plaque Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data from coronary calcium score (CACS) scans were used to screen and predict the presence of obstructive CHD through the elaboration of a gradient boosting machine with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 69.8% and a negative predictive value of 100%. 61…”
Section: Ai and Machine Learning Models In Chdmentioning
confidence: 99%