2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-Learning-Assisted High-Throughput computational screening of Metal–Organic framework membranes for hydrogen separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhong et al developed an ML model to predict i -C 4 H 8 permeability and i -C 4 H 8 /C 4 H 6 selectivity of 601 covalent organic framework (COF) membranes at 1 bar, 298 K, and showed that porosity and pore limiting diameter (PLD) are key factors controlling the selectivity and permeability of COF membranes. Bai et al recently developed eight different ML algorithms to predict H 2 permeability, H 2 /CH 4 membrane selectivity, and trade-off multiple selectivity and permeability (TMSP) of MOFs and showed that two ML models are the most suitable ones for predicting the H 2 separation performances of MOFs. In our recent study, ML models were trained to predict O 2 /N 2 adsorption, diffusion, and membrane selectivities of 5632 MOFs and 137,953 hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) at 1 bar, 298 K, to identify the hMOFs with high O 2 /N 2 selectivity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhong et al developed an ML model to predict i -C 4 H 8 permeability and i -C 4 H 8 /C 4 H 6 selectivity of 601 covalent organic framework (COF) membranes at 1 bar, 298 K, and showed that porosity and pore limiting diameter (PLD) are key factors controlling the selectivity and permeability of COF membranes. Bai et al recently developed eight different ML algorithms to predict H 2 permeability, H 2 /CH 4 membrane selectivity, and trade-off multiple selectivity and permeability (TMSP) of MOFs and showed that two ML models are the most suitable ones for predicting the H 2 separation performances of MOFs. In our recent study, ML models were trained to predict O 2 /N 2 adsorption, diffusion, and membrane selectivities of 5632 MOFs and 137,953 hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) at 1 bar, 298 K, to identify the hMOFs with high O 2 /N 2 selectivity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the variety of membrane backbone materials and available additives as well as the complexity of the fabrication process, rationally designing UF membranes by developing efficient methods to alleviate the time and resource constraints posed by the iterative trial-and-error approach is pivotal. Because of its powerful ability in processing and learning from large, complex, and multidimensional data sets to develop predictive models, machine learning (ML) as a data-driven method has become increasingly important in chemistry and material science communities for accelerating the discovery of new materials and chemical synthesis. In most recent years, ML has been employed to guide gas separation membrane design. In addition, ML models such as tree-based models (e.g., random forest, XGBoost, etc.) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been developed to predict permeance and rejection for RO and NF membranes in water treatment and resource recovery, including but not limited to solvent recovery. Several studies have been acknowledged for the application of ML models in ML-assisted UF membrane fabrication. , However, the performance of these reported models was often limited by the incomplete input variables and unclear classification of the input features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as periodically ordered porous materials are used for the separation film design due to their highly designable crystal structure and high specific surface area. 18 Sun et al prepared ZIF-67 derivative composite films with a permeate flux of 75.16 L m −2 h −1 bar −1 and 99% dye rejection. 19 Moreover, many MOFs with water stability (MIL-53, 20 MIL-125, 21 UiO-66, 22 ZIF-7, 23 ZIF-8, 24 ZIF-68, 25 etc. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%