2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02056-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approach to predict center of pressure trajectories in a complete gait cycle: a feedforward neural network vs. LSTM network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As experimental equipment, six MCam2 cameras (VICON, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) and 2 OR6-6-2000 ground reaction forces (AMTI Inc., Newton, MA, USA) were used. Each system was operated at sampling rates of 120 Hz and 1080 Hz, respectively [24,26,27]. Participants wore a Pedar-X insole system (Pedar Mobile, Novel Electronics Inc., GmbH, Munich, Germany).…”
Section: Subjects Apparatus and Lifting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As experimental equipment, six MCam2 cameras (VICON, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) and 2 OR6-6-2000 ground reaction forces (AMTI Inc., Newton, MA, USA) were used. Each system was operated at sampling rates of 120 Hz and 1080 Hz, respectively [24,26,27]. Participants wore a Pedar-X insole system (Pedar Mobile, Novel Electronics Inc., GmbH, Munich, Germany).…”
Section: Subjects Apparatus and Lifting Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found hybrid approaches incorporating domain knowledge by feature selection into the model to be helpful for accurate predictions. Different approaches were used to automatically derive the most relevant information from the data and reduce redundancy: an exhaustive greedy algorithm [ 16 ] has been used to find the most relevant features to predict the centre of pressure trajectory [ 17 ] or the 3D ground reaction force using pressure insoles [ 18 ]. The correlation between different inputs has been determined to exclude highly correlated input features from 3D segment angles for the prediction of the knee adduction moment [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the input matrix had a size of 38,332 (number of frames: 38,332 = 5 subjects × 74 steps × 148 frames × 70% for training dataset) × 6-24 (number of input features, which depended on the IMU combination). The input matrix size might be considered comparable to the previous study of estimating the inclination angle between the center of mass and COP (36,000 × 9), which involved 24 subjects (Choi et al, 2019a). However, the input matrix provided sufficient within-subject variability, but not betweensubject variability, due to the limited number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leporace et al (2015) used multilayer perceptron networks to predict tri-axial ground reaction force (GRF) based on IMU data. Choi et al (2019a) compared the performance of the feed-forward artificial neural network (FFANN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) in the prediction of complete gait cycle COP based on single-stance COP. Of the various machine learning algorithms, LSTM is often used in time series data and showed better performance than others (Gers and Schmidhuber, 2000;Zhao et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%