2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.842946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning applied to big data from marine cabled observatories: A case study of sablefish monitoring in the NE Pacific

Abstract: Ocean observatories collect large volumes of video data, with some data archives now spanning well over a few decades, and bringing the challenges of analytical capacity beyond conventional processing tools. The analysis of such vast and complex datasets can only be achieved with appropriate machine learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools. The implementation of AI monitoring programs for animal tracking and classification becomes necessary in the particular case of deep-sea cabled observatories, as tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using YOLO, we addressed specific areas that required further investigation, particularly the "domain shift" phenomenon (Kalogeiton et al, 2016;Ditria et al, 2020) characterized by a decrease in classification performance with varying habitat backgrounds and fish species assemblages. Automatic fish classification often involves the use of relative or absolute (e.g., Campos-Candela et al, 2018) abundance estimators that utilize underwater baited cameras (Connolly et al, 2021) or cabled observatories (Bonofiglio et al, 2022) to count, classify or track fish (Saleh et al, 2022). These underwater images differ significantly from typical free datasets that contain single individuals; these images contain a high diversity of species and large variability in abundance, resulting in reduced classification success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using YOLO, we addressed specific areas that required further investigation, particularly the "domain shift" phenomenon (Kalogeiton et al, 2016;Ditria et al, 2020) characterized by a decrease in classification performance with varying habitat backgrounds and fish species assemblages. Automatic fish classification often involves the use of relative or absolute (e.g., Campos-Candela et al, 2018) abundance estimators that utilize underwater baited cameras (Connolly et al, 2021) or cabled observatories (Bonofiglio et al, 2022) to count, classify or track fish (Saleh et al, 2022). These underwater images differ significantly from typical free datasets that contain single individuals; these images contain a high diversity of species and large variability in abundance, resulting in reduced classification success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algorithm is trained to identify features of fishes and localize regions in a scene. The YOLO (You Only Look Once; Redmon et al, 2016) object detection framework has been frequently used for fish detection and species classification on 2D images (Cai et al, 2020;Jalal et al, 2020;McIntosh et al, 2020;Raza and Hong, 2020;Bonofiglio et al, 2022;Knausgård et al, 2021). The YOLO algorithm and its different versions are widely used since its detecting speed on an entire image are faster and more accurate than classic object detectors (for technical specifications, see: Redmon et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ai-based Automatic Behavior Recognition For Fishesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For temperate fishes, only a few commercial species can be automatically identified by existing models but are nonetheless gaining more recognition. Bonofiglio et al (2022) trained an AI pipeline to detect and track sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, in an underwater canyon in North America on ~650 hours of video recording with ~9000 manual annotations. Due to growing fish databases and application of image processing techniques, AI models can now detect fishes with human-like accuracy in some species such as Scythe butterfly fish (Benson et al, 2013), some tropical species (Spampinato et al, 2010), and mesopelagic species (Allken et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Transfer Learning For Data-deficient Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors did not provide detailed information regarding the configuration of the training and evaluation data. In other works, different variants of YOLO were used to detect sablefish Bonofiglio et al [ 32 ], several nordic fish species [ 33 ], reef fishes [ 34 , 35 ] or fish in mangroves [ 36 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%