2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Applicability for Classification of PAD/VCD Chemotherapy Response Using 53 Multiple Myeloma RNA Sequencing Profiles

Abstract: Multiple myeloma (MM) affects ~500,000 people and results in ~100,000 deaths annually, being currently considered treatable but incurable. There are several MM chemotherapy treatment regimens, among which eleven include bortezomib, a proteasome-targeted drug. MM patients respond differently to bortezomib, and new prognostic biomarkers are needed to personalize treatments. However, there is a shortage of clinically annotated MM molecular data that could be used to establish novel molecular diagnostics. We repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proliferation-associated gene signature for MM described by Hose et alwas used as reference for transcripts upregulated in quickly replicating MM 38 . In the GSE159426 dataset (RNAseq data from 53 MM patients), multivariate analysis compared the expression of Itga4 relative to all of the 17 proliferation-signature transcripts 39 . Controls were chosen among MM markers, such as b2 microglobulin and CS1, and established housekeeping genes, such as tubulin or RPS18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferation-associated gene signature for MM described by Hose et alwas used as reference for transcripts upregulated in quickly replicating MM 38 . In the GSE159426 dataset (RNAseq data from 53 MM patients), multivariate analysis compared the expression of Itga4 relative to all of the 17 proliferation-signature transcripts 39 . Controls were chosen among MM markers, such as b2 microglobulin and CS1, and established housekeeping genes, such as tubulin or RPS18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it should be noted that in both successful results, FloWPS dynamic data trimming method was used as a practical approach to transforming data from a high-dimensional space into a low-dimensional space. Furthermore, the RNAseq and microarray datasets results implied that in both groups of good and poor responders, five genes, including FGFR3, MAF, IGHA2, IGHV1-69, and GRB14 were overexpressed (Borisov et al, 2021).…”
Section: In Multi-omics Data Analyses Of Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The apparent technical heterogeneity of gene expression data essentially reduces our ability to compare multiple datasets at once, both at the cross-platform and at the intraplatform levels (Bartlett, Dhruva, Shah, Ryan, & Ross, 2019;Berger et al, 2017;. The latter is mostly due to the so-called batch effect, which frequently arises even within the same platform and reagent settings; however, similar effects can be seen with the comparison of different sets of experimental data (Aliper et al, 2017;Borisov et al, 2017Borisov et al, , 2021Demetrashvili, Kron, Pethe, Bapat, & Briollais, 2010).…”
Section: Shambhala-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shambhala‐1 allows one‐by‐one adding of new harmonized expression samples to a common pre‐calculated pool, and no recalculation is needed for the whole set of samples. This feature can dramatically reduce calculation time and costs, which is especially sensitive considering next‐level gene expression metrics such as molecular pathway activation levels (Aliper et al., 2017; Borisov et al., 2017; Borisov, Sorokin, Garazha, & Buzdin, 2020; Buzdin, Prassolov, Zhavoronkov, & Borisov, 2017; Buzdin et al., 2014, 2018), individual drug sensitivity estimates (Poddubskaya et al., 2019; Tkachev, Sorokin, Garazha et al., 2020; Zolotovskaia et al., 2019), machine learning models (Borisov & Buzdin, 2019; Borisov et al., 2018, 2021; Tkachev et al., 2019; Tkachev, Sorokin, Borisov, et al., 2020), and more. Technically, the Shambhala‐1 method utilizes a piecewise linear normalization method (XPN) for building a universal gene expression matrix (Shabalin et al., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%