2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-023-03532-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning and the quest for objectivity in climate model parameterization

Abstract: Parameterization and parameter tuning are central aspects of climate modeling, and there is widespread consensus that these procedures involve certain subjective elements. Even if the use of these subjective elements is not necessarily epistemically problematic, there is an intuitive appeal for replacing them with more objective (automated) methods, such as machine learning. Relying on several case studies, we argue that, while machine learning techniques may help to improve climate model parameterization in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves several key steps. Parameter tuning ( Jebeile et al, 2023 ) which fine-tunes the model parameters to optimize performance. Feature engineering focuses on selecting or creating relevant features to enhance model accuracy and predictive power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves several key steps. Parameter tuning ( Jebeile et al, 2023 ) which fine-tunes the model parameters to optimize performance. Feature engineering focuses on selecting or creating relevant features to enhance model accuracy and predictive power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations do not mean we cannot use ML in the carbon cycle. A potential application of ML could be to optimise parameters in process-based models (Bastrikov et al, 2018;Dagon et al, 2020;Jebeile et al, 2023;Li et al, 2023a), or even replace parametrisations in such processbased models by ML (Kraft et al, 2022). A second potential application of ML is bias correction of process-based models (Petetin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Process-unaware Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%