2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning and melanoma: The future of screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…71 Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have further improved the accuracy of ML in melanoma screening, even exceeding some dermatologists. 71,72 These algorithms could improve LM/ LMM diagnosis in the future, 73 although some limitations have to be addressed. Winkler et al 74 investigated the diagnostic performance of a CNN across different melanoma subtypes, including LMM.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have further improved the accuracy of ML in melanoma screening, even exceeding some dermatologists. 71,72 These algorithms could improve LM/ LMM diagnosis in the future, 73 although some limitations have to be addressed. Winkler et al 74 investigated the diagnostic performance of a CNN across different melanoma subtypes, including LMM.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these cover the potential use of AI in differentiating between benign and malignant skin lesions. For example, studies have reviewed the specificities and sensitivities of AI tools for melanoma screening (9). To the best of our knowledge, only one systematic review has been published on dermatological applications of AI in general, not limited to neoplastic lesions (10).…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications are typically validated by comparing their ability to correctly diagnose lesions to the ability of certified dermatologists (32). One review of photo recognition applications by Safran et al included 48 melanoma-screening tools and demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 87.60% and a mean specificity of 83.54% (9). Interest toward this topic has grown to the extent that an international skin imaging competition was founded in 2016 and has been occurring annually since (32,35).…”
Section: Dermatological Applications Of Ai Keratinocyte Carcinomas Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have improved ML's melanoma screening performance even further, outperforming some dermatologists [ 59 ]. Although certain shortcomings have to be resolved, these algorithms can enhance LM/LMM diagnosis in the future [ 60 ]. A CNN was used by Winkler et al [ 61 ] to diagnose different melanoma subtypes, including LMM.…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%