2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning and feature engineering-based study into sarcasm and irony classification with application to cyberbullying detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, these ensemble models reduced the training and execution time for classification, the major limitation comes when utilized sarcasm tweets and multiple-meaning acronym terms. Chia et al [8] also utilized different ML and feature engineeringbased approaches to classify irony and sarcasm from cyberbullying tweets. In this approach, many classifiers and feature selection methods were tested; while this approach greatly detects the sarcasm and irony terms among cyberbullying tweets, the detection rate is still very low [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, these ensemble models reduced the training and execution time for classification, the major limitation comes when utilized sarcasm tweets and multiple-meaning acronym terms. Chia et al [8] also utilized different ML and feature engineeringbased approaches to classify irony and sarcasm from cyberbullying tweets. In this approach, many classifiers and feature selection methods were tested; while this approach greatly detects the sarcasm and irony terms among cyberbullying tweets, the detection rate is still very low [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyberbullying detection within the Twitter platform has largely been pursued through tweet classification and to a certain extent with topic modeling approaches. Text classification based on supervised machine learning (ML) models are commonly used for classifying tweets into bullying and non-bullying tweets [8] [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16],and [17]. Deep learning (DL) based classifiers have also been used for classifying tweets into bullying and non-bullying tweets [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research advances a novel DDT strategy that processes input components by utilizing the DNN hidden layer as tree nodes, as demonstrated in previous research. Chia et al [ 16 ] use feature engineering and machine learning approaches to explore the use of irony and sarcasm on social media platforms. To begin, they define and assess the definitions of sarcasm and irony by looking at a large number of research studies that are focused on the contexts in which they are used.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, (Eronen et al, 2021 ) used the re-annotated dataset version of (Ptaszynski et al, 2018 ) to study the effect of Feature Density using various feature preprocessing methods to estimate dataset complexity and, in consequence, to evaluate the performance of machine learning classifiers before starting to train the models. Chia et al ( 2021 ) conducted a study to show the practical applicability of sarcasm and irony detection in other NLP tasks, such as CB. They built an ML model trained on a dataset dedicated for sarcastic detection and tested it on the re-annotated version of the Formspring CB dataset using the same settings.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all forms of CB have the same harmful impact. For instance, even if it appears only once, a threatening message might be considered dangerous or even more than repeated irony messages (Chia et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%