2020
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning and Design of Experiments: Alternative approaches or complementary methodologies for quality improvement?

Abstract: Machine Learning (ML), or the ability of self-learning computer algorithms to autonomously structure and interpret data, is a methodological approach to solve complicated optimization problems based on abundant data. ML is recently gaining momentum as algorithmic applications, computing potency, and available data sets increased manifold over the past two decades, providing an information-rich environment in which human reasoning can partially be replaced by computer reasoning. In this paper, we want to assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…155,156 On the other hand, ML could substantially help the aim of DoE by detecting non-obvious factor effects and interactions (falsely considering interrelated factors as independent is a common problem in DoE approaches). 157 ML algorithms could completely replace the DoE approaches, as theoretically they are able to create correlations by taking into account all the possible factors inuencing a process. However, in reality we are signicantly restricted by the lack of enough computational power (and sometimes data) to create and run such complex models.…”
Section: Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…155,156 On the other hand, ML could substantially help the aim of DoE by detecting non-obvious factor effects and interactions (falsely considering interrelated factors as independent is a common problem in DoE approaches). 157 ML algorithms could completely replace the DoE approaches, as theoretically they are able to create correlations by taking into account all the possible factors inuencing a process. However, in reality we are signicantly restricted by the lack of enough computational power (and sometimes data) to create and run such complex models.…”
Section: Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, revealing all the information encrypted over the large amount of experimental results derived from this type of multifactorial processes becomes a highly challenging task. In such cases, machine learning (ML) offers a cutting-edge computer-based methodology with the ability of handling very complex multivariate datasets, in which there are unknown patterns between inputs and outputs or large amount of uncategorized or different kind of data relating with complex processes, being able to transform data into useful information and knowledge (Gago et al, 2010c;Ertel, 2017;Bini, 2018;Freiesleben et al, 2020). On this purpose, different ML algorithms such as artificial neural networks (ANNs); deep neural networks (DNNs); convolutional neural networks (CNNs); support vector machines (SVMs) or random forest (RF) has been used in plant biotechnology (Niazian and Niedbala, 2020) and, particularly, in PTC (Gago et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous industrial sectors have come to rely on traditional optimisation techniques (such as DoE, mechanistic modelling, pharmacokinetics (PK) modelling, and FEA), so are ML techniques really favourable for adoption in pharmaceutical 3DP? In short, ML is the future of process optimisation, and will likely combine with elements of traditional tools or supersede them entirely [206,256,257]. Whereas traditional techniques are often limited by their scope of use (e.g., PK modelling focuses on in vivo drug behaviour), ML can cover the breadth of existing non-AI tools combined.…”
Section: Machine Learning Vs Non-ml Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%