2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1368/5/052027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning algorithms for helicopter hydraulic faults detection: model based research

Abstract: The problem of automatic reliability monitoring and reliability-centered maintenance is increasingly important today. In this paper, we compare the accuracy of four machine learning approaches for fault detection in a hydraulic system. The first three approaches are based on SVM classifiers with linear, polynomial and RBF kernels and the last one is a gradient boosting on oblivious decision trees. We evaluate algorithms on the synthetic dataset generated by our simulation model of the helicopter hydraulic syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have reported a classification accuracy of 99.17%. A comparison of SVM and CatBoost classifiers was performed by Gareev et al 51 to diagnose mechanical faults and they conclude that SVM gives lower accuracy (85.3%) while CatBoost gives higher classification accuracy up to 99.3%. Long et al 52 has used an improved AdaBoost classifier fed with multi-sensors data for motor fault diagnosis and has achieved a classification accuracy of 92.38%.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have reported a classification accuracy of 99.17%. A comparison of SVM and CatBoost classifiers was performed by Gareev et al 51 to diagnose mechanical faults and they conclude that SVM gives lower accuracy (85.3%) while CatBoost gives higher classification accuracy up to 99.3%. Long et al 52 has used an improved AdaBoost classifier fed with multi-sensors data for motor fault diagnosis and has achieved a classification accuracy of 92.38%.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the machine learning methods and artificial intelligence techniques have been developed for various applications, such as helicopter hydraulic FD problems, medical diagnosis systems, risk assessment applications, and so on [17][18][19][20]. These approaches have also been employed for FD problems in a few studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gareev et al compared the accuracy of four machine-learning approaches for fault detection in a hydraulic system. The first three approaches are based on support vector machine (SVM) classifiers with linear, polynomial, and radial basis function kernels, and the last is gradient boosting on oblivious decision trees [ 8 ]. Kim and Jeong used a five-layer VGGNet based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for data augmentation because the amount of hydraulic system data is insufficient, which shows good performance in terms of accuracy and loss for the classification of hydraulic system data [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%