2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning algorithms for accurate differential diagnosis of lymphocytosis based on cell population data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study using CBC test data, three data mining methods: association rules, rule induction and deep learning were tested and the results showed that the deep learning classifier with the best ability for predicting tumors from blood diseases with an accuracy of 79.45%, with the limitation of no explanation of results 31 . Another related study 32 used machine learning algorithm to differentiate lymphoid classification using CPD parameters from 3 cohorts: healthy control, viral infection and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In that study, the best result came from Neural Networks classifier with an accuracy of 98.7% followed by SVM 98.0% and KNN 98.0% 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study using CBC test data, three data mining methods: association rules, rule induction and deep learning were tested and the results showed that the deep learning classifier with the best ability for predicting tumors from blood diseases with an accuracy of 79.45%, with the limitation of no explanation of results 31 . Another related study 32 used machine learning algorithm to differentiate lymphoid classification using CPD parameters from 3 cohorts: healthy control, viral infection and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In that study, the best result came from Neural Networks classifier with an accuracy of 98.7% followed by SVM 98.0% and KNN 98.0% 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another related study 32 used machine learning algorithm to differentiate lymphoid classification using CPD parameters from 3 cohorts: healthy control, viral infection and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In that study, the best result came from Neural Networks classifier with an accuracy of 98.7% followed by SVM 98.0% and KNN 98.0% 32 . A recent study using CPD showed Random Forest algorithm as the best model with two www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ practices, using all parameters and reduced parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, we note that the present imaging cytometry platform integrated with artificial intelligence-aided image processing would allow multiparametric quantification of cell populations with unrivaled throughput and resolution and facilitate the identification of cell characteristics relevant for sample classification in a range of molecular diagnostic strategies, such as morphology-based diagnosis of rare cells in blood diseases (Brereton et al, 2015;Bigorra et al, 2019) or circulating tumor cells (Ogle et al, 2016). In addition, our platform is ideally suited for the classification of membrane-less organelles on the basis of their localization and composition inside cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All programs showed high predictability and versatility . AI and ML have also been applied in the following fields: the morphological analysis of blood cells, the identification of prognostic factors of ALL in childhood, and the differential diagnosis of hematological diseases …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 AI and ML have also been applied in the following fields: the morphological analysis of blood cells, 25 the identification of prognostic factors of ALL in childhood, 26 and the differential diagnosis of hematological diseases. 27 High CIR rates after allo-HSCT represent a clinical issue that needs to be resolved in adverse risk AL. [3][4][5] To improve outcomes, attempts are being made to develop strategies that reduce the risk of relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%