1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machinability Improvement of Steels at High Cutting Speeds – Study of Tool/Work Material Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…an average coefficient of friction measured through variable uncut chip thickness experiments [5,11,12] . an average coefficient of friction measured through variable uncut chip thickness experiments [5,11,12] .…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an average coefficient of friction measured through variable uncut chip thickness experiments [5,11,12] . an average coefficient of friction measured through variable uncut chip thickness experiments [5,11,12] .…”
Section: Experimental and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim that the magnitude of the fracture strain does not affect simulation results [21]. Thus, taking into consideration that in the course of the cutting process the material was subjected both to temperature effect and influences arising from high deformation rate, the actual failure strain value may be 1.16 to 1.75 times larger than its static equivalent [22].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dynamic Behavior Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamann et al [6] investigated the effect of metallurgical treatments after deoxidation of free machining steels on the machinability by conducting orthogonal cutting tests, a SHPB test, and numerical simulations of the cutting process. They used a reversed method to identify parameters for JC constitutive model for two low carbon free cutting steels, namely S300 and S300 Si and two low-alloyed structural free machining steels, 42CD4 U and 42CD4 Ca.…”
Section: Constitutive Models For Work Materials Flow Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary shear zone is assumed having a constant thickness, and according to experiments and data that found from literature, its value is approximated by one-half of the uncut chip thickness. Along with data published by Hamann et al [6] for 42CD4 U, and S300, orthogonal cutting experiments are undertaken for stainless steel 316L and 35NCD16 to verify the effectiveness of proposed methodology. However, they neither presented an adequate formulation for the friction at the chip-tool interface in their model, nor attempted to determine friction parameters.…”
Section: Prior Research In Determination Of Flow Stress Models From Omentioning
confidence: 99%