2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3372137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mach number dependence of electron heating in high Mach number quasiperpendicular shocks

Abstract: The efficiency of electron heating through microinstabilities generated in the transition region of a quasiperpendicular shock for a wide range of Mach numbers is investigated by utilizing particle-in-cell ͑PIC͒ simulation and model analyses. In the model analyses saturation levels of effective electron temperature as a result of microinstabilities are estimated from an extended quasilinear ͑trapping͒ analysis for relatively low ͑high͒ Mach number shocks. Here, modified two-stream instability ͑MTSI͒ is assumed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand electron heating in collisionless shocks, fully-kinetic simulations with the particle-incell (PIC) method (Birdsall & Langdon 1991;Hockney & Eastwood 1981) are essential to self-consistently capture the role of electron and proton plasma instabilities in particle heating. So far, most PIC studies of electron heating in shocks have focused on the regime of high sonic Mach number (M s 10, where M s is the ratio of the upstream flow speed relative to the shock to the upstream sound speed) and low plasma beta (β p0 1, where β p0 is the ratio of thermal and magnetic pressures) appropriate for supernova remnants (Dieckmann et al 2012;Matsukiyo & Scholer 2003;Matsukiyo 2010). In the first paper of this series (Guo et al 2017, hereafter, Paper I), we investigated by means of analytical theory and two-dimensional (2D) PIC simulations the physics of electron heating in low Mach number perpendicular shocks, a regime so far unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand electron heating in collisionless shocks, fully-kinetic simulations with the particle-incell (PIC) method (Birdsall & Langdon 1991;Hockney & Eastwood 1981) are essential to self-consistently capture the role of electron and proton plasma instabilities in particle heating. So far, most PIC studies of electron heating in shocks have focused on the regime of high sonic Mach number (M s 10, where M s is the ratio of the upstream flow speed relative to the shock to the upstream sound speed) and low plasma beta (β p0 1, where β p0 is the ratio of thermal and magnetic pressures) appropriate for supernova remnants (Dieckmann et al 2012;Matsukiyo & Scholer 2003;Matsukiyo 2010). In the first paper of this series (Guo et al 2017, hereafter, Paper I), we investigated by means of analytical theory and two-dimensional (2D) PIC simulations the physics of electron heating in low Mach number perpendicular shocks, a regime so far unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the relative velocity between incoming electrons and incoming/reflected ions becomes slower than the electron thermal velocity at lowerMach-number perpendicular shocks, high-frequency electrostatic waves are not excited due to the damping by thermal electrons, and the modified two-stream instability (MTSI) [12][13][14][15][16] becomes dominant. Then, obliquely propagating electromagnetic whistler mode waves are excited at a frequency between the electron cyclotron frequency and the lower hybrid resonance frequency 5,6,[17][18][19][20][21] . Our previous study 22 has clearly shown that for a relatively low Mach number (M A = 6) perpendicular shock the MTSI becomes dominant with higher mass ratios (m i /m e ≥ 100) while the ECDI becomes dominant with smaller mass ratio (m i /m e = 25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al (2018) carried out two-dimensional kinetic particle-in-cell simulations of low-Mach-number shocks, assuming galactic shocks, and showed T e /T i ∼ 0.24 at M = 5, independent of the plasma beta ranging 4 < β < 32. In addition, Matsukiyo (2010) found that the post-shock temperature ratio is proportional to the magnetosonic Mach number and T e /T i = 0.01 when the shock parameters are β = 10 and M = 14.…”
Section: Electron Heating At Shock Wavesmentioning
confidence: 98%