MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Second Edition

Fenson, Larry; Marchman, Virginia A.; Thal, Donna; Dale, Philip S.; Reznick, J. Steven; Bates, Elizabeth

doi:10.1037/t11538-000

Cited by 1,942 publications

(3,339 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

3,105

Contrasting

Unclassified

134

Order By: Relevance

“…Change in rate of rhythmic arm activity (a) and proportions of arm and finger rhythmicities (b) in relation to reduplicated babble onset in Infant Siblings and NR infants. Table 2 Patterns of clinically significant delays in motor milestone attainment and language development in Infant Siblings Note D = milestones for which there was a clinically significant delay (at or below the 5th percentile, adopted from appropriate norms; Fenson et al, 1993;Piper &Darrah, 1994). Data from the two children who screened positive on the PDDST-II at 18 months are indicated in boldface.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory-At each visit beginning at 8 months, caregivers completed the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI; Fenson et al, 1993) as a measure of early communicative and language development. In this paper, we focus on the 18-month data.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scores for all children were then compared to the appropriate norms (Fenson et al, 1993); scores falling at or below the 5th percentile were deemed to represent a clinically significant language delay (e.g., Dale et al, 1998).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Variation in Vocal-Motor Development in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism

Iverson

Wozniak

2006

J Autism Dev Disord

222

183

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study we examined early motor, vocal, and communicative development in a group of younger siblings of children diagnosed with autism (Infant Siblings). Infant Siblings and no-risk comparison later-born infants were videotaped at home with a primary caregiver each month from 5 to 14 months, with follow-up at 18 months. As a group, Infant Siblings were delayed in the onset of early developmental milestones and spent significantly less time in a greater number of postures, suggestive of relative postural instability. In addition, they demonstrated attenuated patterns of change in rhythmic arm activity around the time of reduplicated babble onset; and they were highly likely to exhibit delayed language development at 18 months.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Variation in Vocal-Motor Development in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism

Iverson

Wozniak

2006

J Autism Dev Disord

222

183

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each child's parents were interviewed to collect data for the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Survey version [Sparrow, Balla, & Cicchetti, 1984] and the Autism Diagnsostic InterviewRevised [ADI-R; Lord, Rutter, Conture, 1994a;Lord, Rutter, Le Couteur, 1994b]. They also filled out the MacArthur Communicative Development InventoryWords & Gestures [CDI; Fensen et al, 2002].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Higher ADOS scores indicate increased symptomotology/impairment. e MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)-Words & Gestures [Fensen et al, 1993] age equivalents (AE) in months for Expressive Vocabulary (EV), Receptive Vocabulary (RV), Play and Gestural Schemes (P&G) and Phrases Understood (Ph) [standard scores are not available for these measures].…”

Section: Aim 2: Prospective Description Of Communicative Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Language outcomes of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: a two year follow‐up

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thirty-seven children 15-25 months of age received clinical diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and were reevaluated two years later. All subjects were judged to have retained a diagnosis of ASD at the follow-up evaluation. Communication scores for the group as a whole during the first visit were significantly lower than nonverbal IQ. However, by the second visit, verbal and nonverbal scores were no longer significantly different. The group was divided into two subgroups, based on expressive language (EL) outcome at the second visit. The two groups were similar in the second year of life in terms of expressive communication skills and autistic symptoms, except for a trend toward more stereotypic and repetitive behavior in the worse outcome group. By the second visit, however, the groups differed significantly on all standard measures of expression and reception, as well as on autistic symptomotology and nonverbal IQ. When assessed during their second year, children who ended up in the better outcome group showed higher average nonverbal cognitive level, receptive language (RL) scores, number of sounds and words produced, use of symbolic play schemes, and response to joint attention bids. Regression analysis revealed that the variables for which significant differences between the two outcome groups in their second year of life were found provided significant prediction of EL outcome at age four. Stepwise regression identified RL and presence of stereotypic and repetitive at the first visit as significantly associated with EL outcome. Implications of these findings for early identification and intervention are discussed.

show abstract

The Impact of Cochlear Implants on Young Deaf Children

Quittner

Leibach

Marciel

2004

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

uch evidence suggests that, early in life, auditory input and communication are essential for the normal development of language, cognition, and behavior. Thus, deaf children, who experience significant disruptions in auditory input, are likely to show delays not only in the production of oral language but in other important aspects of development such as visual attention and behavioral control. Cochlear implants have shown tremendous promise in restoring auditory information to deaf children and concomitant improvements in speech recognition and production. However, little is known about how cochlear implants affect psychological variables. In this multisite trial, we assess the effects of cochlear implants on a range of developmental outcomes, including visual attention, problem-solving skills, symbolic play, and social adjustment. Measuring these constructs in young children, primarily younger than 2 years, has presented a number of unique challenges. In this article, we describe the methods used to assess these variables in young children and present preliminary findings comparing joint attention and symbolic play skills in a small sample of age-matched deaf and hearing children. As expected, deaf children performed more poorly than hearing children on measures of attention and symbolic play. As auditory input is restored via a cochlear implant, we predict that significant improvements in these variables will be observed.

show abstract

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Second Edition

Cited by 1,942 publications

References 9 publications

Variation in Vocal-Motor Development in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism

Variation in Vocal-Motor Development in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism

Language outcomes of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: a two year follow‐up

The Impact of Cochlear Implants on Young Deaf Children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About