2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-020-02295-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAC-layer rate control for 802.11 networks: a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in real-world ad hoc network systems, it is assumed that the network topology or wireless link quality varies frequently due to node mobility, channel fading, and interference. Therefore, in order to adapt to such situations, it is essential to exchange some control frames among network nodes [18,19]. In this sense, RTS/CTS-based FD MAC design is an important task, especially for ad hoc networks.…”
Section: Wireless Fd Communication and Csma-based Fd Mac Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in real-world ad hoc network systems, it is assumed that the network topology or wireless link quality varies frequently due to node mobility, channel fading, and interference. Therefore, in order to adapt to such situations, it is essential to exchange some control frames among network nodes [18,19]. In this sense, RTS/CTS-based FD MAC design is an important task, especially for ad hoc networks.…”
Section: Wireless Fd Communication and Csma-based Fd Mac Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in real-world ad hoc network systems, the network topology or wireless link quality frequently varies due to node mobility, channel fading, and interference. To adapt to such situations, some control frames must be exchanged among network nodes [18,19]. From the viewpoint of MAC-layer operations, it is helpful for clarifying the relationship between network performance and an essential operation in RTSbased FD MAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will present a brief summary of the main characteristics of existing rate adaptation algorithms (RAA). RAAs can be classified into various categories according to the metrics that they use to evaluate the channel or link quality such as frame loss and SNR in [9], or consecutive transmission count, frame loss ratio, transmission time, throughput, SNR, bit error rate, and combined metrics in [10]. We chose to classify RAAs into three categories: (i) Explicit Feedback, in which RAAs base their bit rate adaptation on the receiver feedback, (ii) Implicit Feedback, in which RAAs base their adaptation on the information available on the sender side, and (iii) Hybrid, which is a category that combines information from feedback of the receiver and information available to the sender.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of a faster data rate is transmission quality reduction. The appropriate data rate is selected based on the relative relationship between the frame delivery ratio (FDR) and the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Sodhro, A.H. et al, [ 28 ] proposed an energy-efficient transmission power control (ETPC) algorithm that was based on a wireless channel estimation.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%