MAC Layer and Scalability Aspects of Vehicular Communication Networks

Mittag, Jens; Schmidt-Eisenlohr, Felix; Killat, Moritz; Torrent-Moreno, Marc; Hartenstein, Hannes

doi:10.1002/9780470740637.ch7

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…where N is the number of vehicles in CR and N max is a saturation point [2]. The upper boundary can be approached by synchronizing the phases at the application level.…”

Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Performance and fairness in VANETs

Batsuuri

Bril

Lukkien

2011

2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This paper presents performance and fairness analysis of the 802.11p Medium Access Control (MAC) in onehop periodic broadcast V2V communication used in cooperative driving applications aimed for improving vehicle safety and traffic efficiency. We show that both performance and fairness strongly dependent on the random relative phasing (Φ0) of the vehicles and on the impact of Hidden Nodes (HNs).

show abstract

“…where N is the number of vehicles in CR and N max is a saturation point [2]. The upper boundary can be approached by synchronizing the phases at the application level.…”

Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, periodic one-hop BC that is needed in the forward collision warning application [2] requires a frequency of 10 packets per second with a maximum latency of 100 ms and a minimum communication range (CR) of 150 meters. In general, one-hop periodic BC comes in two flavors: event-driven and periodic.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and fairness in VANETs

Batsuuri

Bril

Lukkien

2011

2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These applications require a frequency of 10 messages per second with a maximum no message interval (or a tolerance time window) of [0.3sec,1.0sec] [1,4,5]. In addition, these applications pose a strict fairness requirement on oPBC [6,7], where each vehicle should have equal opportunity for using the shared channel. In this type of system, message loss is unavoidable (we explain the causes below); however, it must not be the case that one or a few vehicles take all the loss, because this would result in these vehicles becoming a danger to their surrounding vehicles.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%