2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MaBμlS-2: high-precision microlensing modelling for the large-scale survey era

Abstract: Galactic microlensing datasets now comprise in excess of 104 events and, with the advent of next-generation microlensing surveys that may be undertaken with facilities such as the Rubin Observatory (formerly LSST) and Roman Space Telescope (formerly WFIRST), this number will increase significantly. So too will the fraction of events with measurable higher order information, such as finite-source effects and lens–source relative proper motion. Analysing such data requires a more sophisticated Galactic microlens… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Mróz et al (2017) shows the likelihood peak at α bd ∼ 0.8 using the Galactic model based on Han & Gould (1995 with simplified disk kinematics, Specht et al (2020) shows the likelihood peak at α bd = −0.1, and 0.8 (-0.8 in their definition) is significantly disfavored according to their Figure 4. Specht et al (2020) used the Besançon model (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2012(Robin et al , 2017 for their analysis using a more realistic model for disk kinematics. However, the Besançon model also has some unrealistic features, as discussed by Penny et al (2019), such as the small Galactic bar angle of 13 • compared to 25 • -30 • implied by other observations (see a review by Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Mróz et al (2017) shows the likelihood peak at α bd ∼ 0.8 using the Galactic model based on Han & Gould (1995 with simplified disk kinematics, Specht et al (2020) shows the likelihood peak at α bd = −0.1, and 0.8 (-0.8 in their definition) is significantly disfavored according to their Figure 4. Specht et al (2020) used the Besançon model (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2012(Robin et al , 2017 for their analysis using a more realistic model for disk kinematics. However, the Besançon model also has some unrealistic features, as discussed by Penny et al (2019), such as the small Galactic bar angle of 13 • compared to 25 • -30 • implied by other observations (see a review by Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another case motivating this concern is the IMF in brown dwarf mass range of M < 0.08 M , parameterized by a slope, α bd , with dN/dM ∝ M −α bd , and inferred by the t E distribution from the OGLE-IV survey (Mróz et al 2017). Although Mróz et al (2017) shows the likelihood peak at α bd ∼ 0.8 using the Galactic model based on Han & Gould (1995 with simplified disk kinematics, Specht et al (2020) shows the likelihood peak at α bd = −0.1, and 0.8 (-0.8 in their definition) is significantly disfavored according to their Figure 4. Specht et al (2020) used the Besançon model (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2012(Robin et al , 2017 for their analysis using a more realistic model for disk kinematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the mass measurement) of events. To list a few, this includes the consideration of limb-darkening for a more accurate To assess the number of FFPs where such mass constraints could be obtained, we used a specially modified version of the MaBµlS-2 simulator 3 (Specht et al 2020) to allow for FFPs and to consider simultaneous parallax by separated observatories. MaBµlS-2 employs a synthetic population of microlensing lenses and source stars seeded from version 1307 of the Besançon Galactic model (BGM) (Robin et al 2012(Robin et al , 2014.…”
Section: Simulation Of Joint Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MaBµlS-2 employs a synthetic population of microlensing lenses and source stars seeded from version 1307 of the Besançon Galactic model (BGM) (Robin et al 2012(Robin et al , 2014. MaBµlS-2 has been demonstrated by Specht et al (2020) to provide an accurate match to the 8,000-event sample from the OGLE-IV survey (Mróz et al 2019c). Using the BGM, MaBµlS-2 simulates the microlensing event rate from the synthetic stellar catalogues produced.…”
Section: Simulation Of Joint Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation