2002
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maastricht’s Fiscal Rules at Ten: An Assessment

Abstract: The Maastricht Treaty is ten years old. Its fiscal rules played a key role in kickstarting and sustaining the budgetary retrenchment efforts in European Union countries in the run-up to economic and monetary union (EMU). The experience of the Maastricht-induced fiscal consolidation shows that the political economy dimension of the rules is key to their success. It remains to be seen whether the stability and growth pact -which aims to lock EMU members into a permanent fiscal discipline commitment while allowin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Excessive government borrowing would be addressed in EMU's institutional design through the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) and a 'no bailout' clause. However, some doubted whether the SGP possessed the credible threat against over-borrowing of its predecessor since, in contrast to the Maastricht criteria, failure to comply with the SGP would not result in EMU exclusion (Buti and Giudice, 2002;Johnston, 2012). Moreover, as Baskaran and Hessami (2012) and Arghyrou and Kontonikas (2010) argue, relaxation of the SGP's fiscal rules by France and Germany led to soft budget constraints after 2004, and further enabled the high deficit nations to succumb to 'binge' borrowing, as markets discounted for the best case scenario for convergence even when some nations were showing signs of fiscal deterioration.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Europe's Sovereign Debt Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive government borrowing would be addressed in EMU's institutional design through the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) and a 'no bailout' clause. However, some doubted whether the SGP possessed the credible threat against over-borrowing of its predecessor since, in contrast to the Maastricht criteria, failure to comply with the SGP would not result in EMU exclusion (Buti and Giudice, 2002;Johnston, 2012). Moreover, as Baskaran and Hessami (2012) and Arghyrou and Kontonikas (2010) argue, relaxation of the SGP's fiscal rules by France and Germany led to soft budget constraints after 2004, and further enabled the high deficit nations to succumb to 'binge' borrowing, as markets discounted for the best case scenario for convergence even when some nations were showing signs of fiscal deterioration.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Europe's Sovereign Debt Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, the participating countries were desgnated according to political criteria. The …scal requirements were then reiterated in the SGP (BUTI 2002 JCommMarkStudies with solution), which remained the only defence line against the possible lack of discipline of the national governments. The aims of the Pact was …rst, to ensure a policy framework based on low in ‡ation and economic stability and second, to protect the European Central Bank from potential pressure for debt bailouts coming from the national governments.…”
Section: Economic Arguments Supporting the Sgpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correct or incomplete implementation can be attributed to several factors, some of which are summarized by Buti and Giudice (2002). First, the requirement of budget close to balance or in surplus in the medium run is confronted with the lack of consensus of how an output gap, and therefore a structural balance, should be measured.…”
Section: Why the Sgp Is Under Pressure And The Maaastricht Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will draw on the standard analytical framework by which the EMU macroeconomic governance is usually analysed (BUTI ET AL., 2001; BUTI AND GIUDICE, 2002 The aggregate supply function is the standard one:…”
Section: Macroeconomic Governance Under the Stability And Growth Pactmentioning
confidence: 99%