MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?

Hörcher, Dániel; Graham, Daniel J.

doi:10.1016/j.ecotra.2020.100167

Cited by 32 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, the model does consider some level of randomness in the tariff choice situation, which may represent the uncertainty of advance payments in case of subscriptions, but love of variety is excluded on this level. In other words, consumer welfare cannot be increased by introducing a large number of very cheap tariff products, which would otherwise be the case if the random component of utility were considered as a tangible benefit for users (see a detailed discussion on this assumption in Hörcher and Graham, 2020).…”

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As in the previous cases, the car ownership rate is expressed with the logit assumptions, and expected utility, which captures consumer surplus in the entire model, is computed with the logsum formula. Detailed mathematical formulations of the model are available in Hörcher and Graham (2020).…”

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The optimal supply variables are derived using numerical optimisation (for technical details, see Hörcher and Graham, 2020). The first seven columns of Table 2 show the optimal fare and subscription levels in all six scenarios.…”

Section: Scenario 3: Profit Oriented Subscriptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Schematic overview of the decision tree of a model with endogenous car ownership, subscription purchases and daily mode choice Source:Hörcher and Graham (2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of the attractiveness of MaaS subscriptions on system-level efficiency (social welfare) and the financial result of public transport and car sharing provision Source:Hörcher and Graham (2020) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Pricing and Efficient Public Transport Supply in a Mobility as a Service Context

Hörcher

Graham

2020

International Transport Forum Discussion Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ITF Discussion Papers make economic research, commissioned or carried out in-house at ITF, available to researchers and practitioners. They describe preliminary results or research in progress by the author(s) and are published to stimulate discussion on a broad range of issues on which the ITF works. Any findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Transport Forum or the OECD. Neither the OECD, ITF nor the authors guarantee the accuracy of any data or other information contained in this publication and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Comments on Discussion Papers are welcome.

show abstract

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Scenario 3: Profit Oriented Subscriptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Schematic overview of the decision tree of a model with endogenous car ownership, subscription purchases and daily mode choice Source:Hörcher and Graham (2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Pricing and Efficient Public Transport Supply in a Mobility as a Service Context

Hörcher

Graham

2020

International Transport Forum Discussion Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Fun to drive? The dynamics of car manufacturers' differentiation strategies

Hoeft

2021

Strategic Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Car manufacturers attempt to differentiate through a combination of technological and nontechnological differentiators, motivated by varying degrees of sustainability and competitive advantage rationale across first movers and followers. This paper investigates how differentiation efforts disseminate from individual firms to industry‐wide engagements and why some firms decide to move first. The case of incumbent car manufacturers is used to shed light on how and why firms differentiate and how differentiation links to the sustainability transition of the industry. The research highlights that car manufacturers attempt to differentiate through a combination of technological and nontechnological differentiators, motivated by varying degrees of sustainability and competitive advantage rationale across first movers and followers. A first‐mover advantage is particularly evident in technological differentiators.

show abstract

Shared Mobility für jüngere und ältere Nutzer:innen – Potenziale, Akzeptanz- und Hemmnisfaktoren

Schwindt

Joisten

Theobald

et al. 2023

Towards the New Normal in Mobility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?

Cited by 32 publications

References 28 publications

Pricing and Efficient Public Transport Supply in a Mobility as a Service Context

Pricing and Efficient Public Transport Supply in a Mobility as a Service Context

Fun to drive? The dynamics of car manufacturers' differentiation strategies

Shared Mobility für jüngere und ältere Nutzer:innen – Potenziale, Akzeptanz- und Hemmnisfaktoren

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About