2018
DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v18_5_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The netting of the fish farm, with biofouling or not, was simulated using the porous-media fluid model. The porous coefficients for both clean and biofouled netting were calculated from the drag and lift forces that acts on corresponding clean or biofouled plane net, consequently the relationship between the porous coefficients and the features of the netting as well as the biofouling is established. In this study, both constant and tidal currents through a fish farm, consisting of 2×4 full-scale net cages, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of flow velocity reduction factor, which can be changed due to various reasons Bi, et at., 2014;Zhao, et al, 2013), was also examined. For example, biofouling commonly happens to fish cages in seawater with biological layers attached to the net surface, leading to an increase in the flow velocity reduction factor u C , i.e., the flow velocity for the rear part of the fish cage is reduced due to biofouling (Bi et al, 2017;Bi and Xu, 2018). The volume reduction factors v C for circular cylinder fish cages under a changing flow velocity reduction u C are shown in Table 7 with 0.18 u C = as the baseline factor in this comparison.…”
Section: Circular Cylinder Fish Cagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of flow velocity reduction factor, which can be changed due to various reasons Bi, et at., 2014;Zhao, et al, 2013), was also examined. For example, biofouling commonly happens to fish cages in seawater with biological layers attached to the net surface, leading to an increase in the flow velocity reduction factor u C , i.e., the flow velocity for the rear part of the fish cage is reduced due to biofouling (Bi et al, 2017;Bi and Xu, 2018). The volume reduction factors v C for circular cylinder fish cages under a changing flow velocity reduction u C are shown in Table 7 with 0.18 u C = as the baseline factor in this comparison.…”
Section: Circular Cylinder Fish Cagementioning
confidence: 99%