2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M2I: From Factored Marginal Trajectory Prediction to Interactive Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the Waymo motion prediction challenge design, we train and evaluate our model using only the vehicle agents labeled as objects of interest. Table III shows the performance of our approach along with two new baselines: MotionCNN [10] and M2I [24]. We run the pre-trained models from the two baselines and keep the first 3s prediction for evaluation.…”
Section: B Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the Waymo motion prediction challenge design, we train and evaluate our model using only the vehicle agents labeled as objects of interest. Table III shows the performance of our approach along with two new baselines: MotionCNN [10] and M2I [24]. We run the pre-trained models from the two baselines and keep the first 3s prediction for evaluation.…”
Section: B Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of our model trained for 8s prediction on the interactive validation set is: minADE 6 = 1.59 and minFDE 6 = 3.67. As a comparison, the Waymo LSTM baseline achieves minFDE 6 = 6.07 for 8s prediction [30], and M2I [24] reports minFDE 6 = 5.49.…”
Section: B Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RMSE measures the average displacement error between the predicted trajectories and their corresponding ground truth. This can be either the average error over the entire prediction horizon, reported as mADE, mean average displacement error in literature [11]- [14] or average of momentary error at different time points in the prediction horizon, reported as mFDE, mean final displacement error in literature [11]- [14]. A model with the lowest error is generally considered the better alternative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods output the long-term control variables directly, which can be risky when there are HVs on the road. Learning-based approaches [2,3,16,21] obtain vehicles' driving strategies from open datasets and avoid collisions by predicting other cars' trajectories. The trajectories generated by such methods fail to express driving intentions explicitly and are therefore poorly understood by passengers or other road users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%