2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M sub-shell X-ray fluorescence cross-section measurements for six elements in the range Z = 78–92 at tuned synchrotron photon energies 5, 7 and 9 keV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be achieved more studies about the M shell calculations or measurements using different irradiation source, different elements, different angles and different energy ranges [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Due to the complexity structure of M shell, the parameters were determined for pure elements and different energy ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be achieved more studies about the M shell calculations or measurements using different irradiation source, different elements, different angles and different energy ranges [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Due to the complexity structure of M shell, the parameters were determined for pure elements and different energy ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements involved the creation of M i ( i = 1–5) subshell vacancies through the direct photoionization only. Most of these measurements were performed in air using radioisotopes, the X‐ray tubes with secondary exciter and the synchrotron radiation as photon source employing infinitely thick targets thereby resulting in large corrections due to the absorption of low energy (~1–3 keV) M shell X‐rays by the target itself and the air path between the target and the X‐ray detector. Therefore, the measured cross sections were not very reliable as these have large uncertainty due to use of theoretical total X‐ray mass‐attenuation coefficients for evaluating the absorption corrections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total/line resolved M shell XRP cross sections for some heavy elements (Z ≥ 70) measured at different incident photon energies in the range 6–12 keV ( EnormalM1<Einc<EnormalL3; EnormalM1/ EnormalL3 represent M 1 /L 3 subshell absorption edge energy) reported by different authors are available in the literature. These measurements involved the creation of M i ( i = 1–5) subshell vacancies through the direct photoionization only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%