1998
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-79-10-2425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M protein correlates with the receptor-binding specificity of haemagglutinin protein of reassortant influenza A (H1N1) virus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M1 protein is a strong candidate for this novel role, because it differs in both HKMA20 and HKMA20C relative to HKMA12 and has been implicated in the modulation of HA function. Strains of human influenza H1N1 viruses with identical HA molecules differ in their ability to agglutinate chick erythrocytes because of the nature of their M1 proteins (23). Interestingly, fixation of the M1-167 mutation in the human lineage in 1972 coincided with a change in receptor specificity (24) that did not correlate with changes in HA sequence, again suggesting the involvement of another protein in HA function.…”
Section: Ma Variants Possess Mutations In Specific Functionalmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The M1 protein is a strong candidate for this novel role, because it differs in both HKMA20 and HKMA20C relative to HKMA12 and has been implicated in the modulation of HA function. Strains of human influenza H1N1 viruses with identical HA molecules differ in their ability to agglutinate chick erythrocytes because of the nature of their M1 proteins (23). Interestingly, fixation of the M1-167 mutation in the human lineage in 1972 coincided with a change in receptor specificity (24) that did not correlate with changes in HA sequence, again suggesting the involvement of another protein in HA function.…”
Section: Ma Variants Possess Mutations In Specific Functionalmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Parent A/Memphis/1/71 strain did not show binding to the sialylglycolipids except IV 6 (Neu5Ac)nLc 4 B30 on virus overlay assay. The discrepancy in the binding pattern between WT and A/Memphis/1/71 may be due to matrix protein 1 (M1) of A/WSN/33, which affects binding affinity by interaction with HA at the inner membrane of the virus envelope [13]. N137Y and S193N exhibited the same binding pattern as that of A/Memphis/ 1/71 strain (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order that such adsorption provokes a conformational change in the hemagglutinin, which is a trimer, it must be triggered off by the action of host's proteases in a hemagglutinin site called 'cleavage site' (Tong et al 1998). The endosome's pH formed after adsorption and virus penetration is decisive for the fusion of the viral envelope with the cell membrane culminating in the success of the infection, when it is possible to observe the conformational changes of hemagglutinin that allow such fusion (Wharton et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%