2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M operators: a generalisation of Weyl–Titchmarsh theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] did not make the modification by composition with Λ ± 1 2 , but worked directly with (3.16). This was in order to avoid introducing too many operators.…”
Section: Boundary Tripletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] did not make the modification by composition with Λ ± 1 2 , but worked directly with (3.16). This was in order to avoid introducing too many operators.…”
Section: Boundary Tripletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the results proved for the symmetric case have subsequently been extended to this situation: see, for instance, Malamud and Mogilevski [32] for adjoint pairs of operators, and Malamud and Mogilevski [33,34] for adjoint pairs of linear relations. Amrein and Pearson [1] generalised several results from the classical Weyl-m-function for the one-dimensional SturmLiouville problem to the case of Schrödinger operators, calling them M -functions, in particular they were able to show nesting results for families of M -functions on spherical exterior domains in R 3 . For a recent contribution with applications to PDEs and characterisation of eigenvalues as poles of an operator valued Weyl-M -function, we refer the reader to [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic treatment of this topic faces certain difficulties arising from the lack of a convenient representation of Weyl-Titchmarsh functions. Indeed, neither abstract forms of Herglotz integral, nor more detailed representations found in works [4,17] for some special cases of partial differential operators, are explicit enough to serve as a foundation for the general theory. The present paper links the WeylTitchmarsh functions theory with the theory of linear systems in precise manner.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of Weyl-Titchmarsh function is known for the general SturmLiouville problem, difference operators, orthogonal polynomials, Hamiltonian systems [6,10,26], various classes of extensions of symmetric operators studied within the theory of boundary and quasi-boundary triplets [7,21], and some elliptic partial differential operators [17,22,41], where it is conventionally called the Dirichlet-toNeumann map. The recent remarkable work [4] by W. O. Amrein and D. B. Pearson develops the notion of Weyl function for the three dimensional Schrödinger operator defined in the whole space. Their approach differs from mentioned above in that there is no boundary given a priori, and the authors have to introduce it artificially.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), we refer, for instance, to [2], [3], [4], [11], [12], [13]- [19], [24]- [28], [33]- [39], [42], [44,Ch. 3], [45], [46,Ch.…”
Section: Ac([0 R]) Denotes the Set Of Absolutely Continuous Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%