2011
DOI: 10.1002/wcm.986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M‐DART: multi‐path dynamic address routing

Abstract: The paper proposes a Distributed Hash Table (DHT)-based multi-path routing protocol for scalable ad hoc networks. Specifically, we propose a multipath-based improvement to a recently proposed DHT-based shortest-path routing protocol, namely the Dynamic Address RouTing (DART). The resulting protocol, referred to as multi-path DART (M-DART), guarantees multi-path forwarding without introducing any additional communication or coordination overhead with respect to DART. The performances of M-DART have been evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Address RouTing (DART) [33] and Multi-path DART (M-DART) [34] In DART / M-DART the main objective is geographical routing where the dynamic address assignment is based on the hierarchical tree as in LADC. M-DART provides multi-path routing compared to DART.…”
Section: Ladc Versus Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Address RouTing (DART) [33] and Multi-path DART (M-DART) [34] In DART / M-DART the main objective is geographical routing where the dynamic address assignment is based on the hierarchical tree as in LADC. M-DART provides multi-path routing compared to DART.…”
Section: Ladc Versus Dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Because of it, the problem of conflicting and incommensurate always exists and may not be removed.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the residual energy of a group of node n g is defined by Equation 15. Let the residual energy of a group of node n g is defined by Equation 15.…”
Section: Route Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the link-disjoint paths, the destination node adopts a looser reply policy. It replies up to k copies of RREQ arriving via singular neighbours, discounting the first hops of these RREQs [23]. Singular neighbor who presents in the network guarantees link disjointness in the first hop of the RREP.…”
Section: Aomdvmentioning
confidence: 99%