2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

M 82's stellar bar

Abstract: Abstract. The fueling of the starburst in M 82 may be related to a stellar bar which pushes gas towards the center where it forms stars. The observation by McKeith et al. (1993) of the near-IR Ca II photospheric absorption line allows a direct velocity measurement of the stars in M 82, and provides by this a confirmation of the predicted x1 and x2-orbits of the bar in M 82. From this and other observations we find that the mass of the x2-orbit stars is ∼15% of the mass of the bar, and that the mass of the bar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is not ironclad, and needs to be tested by directly measuring the size of the stellar disk. Indeed, a caveat when interpreting velocity measurements in M82 is that the dynamics in the central regions of the galaxy are dominated by a bar (Wills et al 2000), which accounts for a significant fraction of the total galaxy mass, and so is a dynamically significant component (e.g., Greve et al 2002). Moreover, the velocity field defined by the [S iii] 9069 Å line challenges the presence of Keplerian rotation outside of the region affected by the bar (McKeith et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation is not ironclad, and needs to be tested by directly measuring the size of the stellar disk. Indeed, a caveat when interpreting velocity measurements in M82 is that the dynamics in the central regions of the galaxy are dominated by a bar (Wills et al 2000), which accounts for a significant fraction of the total galaxy mass, and so is a dynamically significant component (e.g., Greve et al 2002). Moreover, the velocity field defined by the [S iii] 9069 Å line challenges the presence of Keplerian rotation outside of the region affected by the bar (McKeith et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that any young and intermediate-age stars in the outer regions of M82 may not have formed in situ, as interactions with M81 and NGC 3077 may have created tidal arms that moved stars out of the plane of the disk. Finally, M82 has a central bar (Telesco et al 1991) that contains 20%-40% of the total galaxy mass (Greve et al 2002), and the disruption of this structure could scatter young stars away from the center of the galaxy (see, e.g., Mayer et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined these data with radial velocities that we published earlier (McKeith et al 1993;Greve et al 2002;abbreviated McK93 and GWNP). We used in addition other radial velocity data at near-IR and visible wavelengths (Westmoquette et al 2009;Whitmore et al 1984) and data of stellar clusters (Konstantopoulos et al 2009) and planetary nebulae (Johnson et al 2009).…”
Section: The Earlier and Unpublished Optical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H i, CO, and (near-)IR velocity observations have revealed the bar's x 1 -orbits, between ∼±30 , and the inner, perpendicular x 2 -orbits, between ∼±10 (e.g. Wills et al 2000;Achtermann & Lacy 1995;Greve et al 2002). Mayya et al (2005;see also Ichikawa et al 1995) used IR images to derive a stellar disk of ∼50 scale length and two trailing spiral arms starting at right angles to the eastern and western extremes of the bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation