2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lysophosphatidic acid enhances PGE2 to PGF2α ratio and nitric oxide level in nonpregnant buffalo uterus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expression levels of OPRK1 were closely related to oocyte maturation [32] and maternal behavior [33]. LPAR3 could interact with multiple reproductive hormones, including progesterone [34], estrogen [35], and prostaglandin [36,37], to affect reproduction. Taken together, our and others' results suggest that the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway could play a critical role in affecting goose reproductive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression levels of OPRK1 were closely related to oocyte maturation [32] and maternal behavior [33]. LPAR3 could interact with multiple reproductive hormones, including progesterone [34], estrogen [35], and prostaglandin [36,37], to affect reproduction. Taken together, our and others' results suggest that the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway could play a critical role in affecting goose reproductive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPAR3 can interact with reproductive hormones to affect reproductive performance, including estrogen and progesterone [ 14 ]. Several studies have shown that LPAR3 enhances nitric oxide levels in the non-pregnant buffalo uterus and facilitates the maintenance of the corpus luteum [ 15 ]. This gene affects reproduction in mice by regulating the spacing of embryos [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative value of this subtraction, the −ΔC T , was used as the exponent of 2 and represented the 'corrected' number of cycles to threshold. The data were expressed as 2 −ΔCT values in both the groups (Schmittgen & Livak 2008, Gokul et al 2018). Student's 't'-test was employed for comparison of means between two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%