2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymph node detection and segmentation in chest CT data using discriminative learning and a spatial prior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the direct one-shot 3D detection (Barbu et al, 2012, Feulner et al, 2013) saturates at ~65% sensitivity at full FP range. Recently, the availability of large-scale annotated training sets and the accessibility of affordable parallel computing resources via GPUs has made it feasible to train deep Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) and achieve great advances in challenging ImageNet recognition tasks (Krizhevsky et al, 2012, Zeiler and Fergus, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, the direct one-shot 3D detection (Barbu et al, 2012, Feulner et al, 2013) saturates at ~65% sensitivity at full FP range. Recently, the availability of large-scale annotated training sets and the accessibility of affordable parallel computing resources via GPUs has made it feasible to train deep Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) and achieve great advances in challenging ImageNet recognition tasks (Krizhevsky et al, 2012, Zeiler and Fergus, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Particularly, lymph nodes have large within-class appearance, location or pose variations, and low contrast from surrounding anatomies over a patient population. This results in many false-positives (FP), to assure a moderately high detection sensitivity (Feuerstein et al, 2009), or only limited sensitivity levels (Barbu et al, 2012, Feulner et al, 2013). The good sensitivities achieved at low FP range in Barbu et al (2012) are not directly comparable with the other studies since Barbu et al (2012) reports on axillary, pelvic, and only some parts of the abdominal regions, while others evaluate only on mediastinum (Feuerstein et al, 2012, Feulner et al, 2013, Feuerstein et al, 2009) or abdomen (Nakamura et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second approach, known as the continuous convex relaxation method, the image is treated in a continuous domain, and the optimal labeling minimization problem, initially nonconvex, is relaxed to obtain an equivalent convex minimization problem, which is solved via continuous max-flow formulation. The scientific literature shows how these types of mathematical models have been used to segment different tumors, mainly in the lungs [4,26,27,42,44,48], liver [29], lymph nodes [5,13,16,17,54], prostate [20,25,31], brain [12] and breast [49]. Some studies used level-set and active contour methods [13,20,25,26,34,44,48], while others were based on the graph-cut method [4,7,12,16,17,27,31,42,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on LN CADe has varied according to the feature types and learning algorithms used for training. [1,8] utilize direct 3D information from CT scans, performing boosting-based feature selection over a pool of 50-60 thousand 3D Haar wavelet features. Due to the curse of dimensionality (analyzed in [14]), such approaches can result in systems with limited sensitivity (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the curse of dimensionality (analyzed in [14]), such approaches can result in systems with limited sensitivity (e.g. 60.9% at 6.1 FP/scan for mediastinal LNs in [8]). Circumventing 3D feature computation during LN classification, [14] implements a shallow hierarchy of linear models operating on 2D slices or views of LN candidate volumes of interest (VOIs) with histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) [3] features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%