Frontiers in Peritoneal Dialysis 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-11784-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lymph Flow from the Peritoneal Cavity in CAPD Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 3) are in accord with previous sequential, direct measurements (25) and infer that fluid absorption in CAPD is mainly lymphatic. The calculated lymphatic absorption rate in this study is much higher than in prior reports (26,27) which determined the rate of lymphatic flow from the rate of mass transfer to radio-labeled tracer from the peritoneal cavity to the blood. This latter method underestimates lymphatic drainage since a significant proportion of the small quantity of radio-labeled colloid administered remains in the subperitoneal interstitium (5) and after systemic absorption the tracer equilibrates out of the blood volume (28).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…1 and 3) are in accord with previous sequential, direct measurements (25) and infer that fluid absorption in CAPD is mainly lymphatic. The calculated lymphatic absorption rate in this study is much higher than in prior reports (26,27) which determined the rate of lymphatic flow from the rate of mass transfer to radio-labeled tracer from the peritoneal cavity to the blood. This latter method underestimates lymphatic drainage since a significant proportion of the small quantity of radio-labeled colloid administered remains in the subperitoneal interstitium (5) and after systemic absorption the tracer equilibrates out of the blood volume (28).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This volume produces almost no measurable intraperitoneal pressure in the rat. Other groups [ 12] have advocated using the body weight to the 0.7 power: for the 200-gram rat. this results in a volume of 30.2 ml [(200/70.000)0-7 X 2.000 ml].…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Design Of Future Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21. 22] and in humans [11][12][13] has shown that fluid and large solutes are removed from the peritoneal cavity at equivalent rates. While 5-25% of the solution leaving the cavity passes directly into the lymphatics, the remainder is transported directly into the surrounding tissue interstitium.…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Design Of Future Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the quantity of macromol ecules appearing in the circulation is only 11-24% of the amount lost over a dwell time of 4-8 h [9. 11, 12], It has been suggested that the difference is caused by accumulation of the marker in the peritoneal interstitial space [9,11], The presence of l25I-human serum albumin in the abdominal wall after a single intraperitoneal administration has been dem onstrated in rats by Flessner et al [8. 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have used the appareance rate of radiolabeled tracers (e.g.. l25I-albumin [8][9][10], 125I-fibrinogen [11] and 5lCr-erythrocytes [11]) in the circulation for the calcula tion of lymphatic absorption and calculated a lymphatic absorption rate of about 0.1-0.3 ml/min. However, the quantity of macromol ecules appearing in the circulation is only 11-24% of the amount lost over a dwell time of 4-8 h [9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%