2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm1120112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lyme borreliosis in Sweden – diagnostic performance of five commercial Borrelia serology kits using sera from well‐defined patient groups

Abstract: Five commercial Borrelia serology kits available in Sweden were evaluated and compared for their diagnostic performance in sera from clinically well-characterized patient groups. With the clinically defined groups as the gold standard, i.e. without knowledge of antibody status in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, the diagnostic performance of the kits was compared and important differences in diagnostic usefulness were found. The kits from Abbot and DAKO, that often predict clinically relevant Borrelia infection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A commercial ELISA kit, based on the Borrelia specific protein flagellin, was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (IDEA Borrelia burgdorferi IgG kit; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark and Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) 13. The method has a good diagnostic performance14 and is used for routine serology of LB in Sweden 15. However, antibody levels are low in early LB (ie, patients with EM) and serology is not recommended owing to low sensitivity 14 16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commercial ELISA kit, based on the Borrelia specific protein flagellin, was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (IDEA Borrelia burgdorferi IgG kit; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark and Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) 13. The method has a good diagnostic performance14 and is used for routine serology of LB in Sweden 15. However, antibody levels are low in early LB (ie, patients with EM) and serology is not recommended owing to low sensitivity 14 16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major problem is that current commercial Lyme serologic tests are not sensitive enough for diagnosis, especially during the later stages of disease [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advocates a "2-tier" testing system using an ELISA or immunofluorescence assay as a screening test, followed by a Western blot for confirmation if the result of the ELISA or immunofluorescence assay is positive.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the diagnosis of Lyme disease remains problematic, with as many as one-half of patients experiencing failure with the current 2-tier testing approach [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One shortcoming of ELISA is that it may cross-react with antigens from other bacteria (e.g other spirochetes such as Treponema and Leptospira) than B. burgdorferi sensu lato (Magnarelli et al, 2012). Another important limitation of ELISA is the lack of standardization: commercially available ELISA tests use different antigenic composition and detect different immunoglobulin classes (Aguero-Rosenfeld et al, 2005;Ekerfelt et al, 2004).…”
Section: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%