2010
DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181d0b02d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LyGDI is a Promising Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: These results suggest that LyGDI has significant potential as a marker for detection of ovarian cancer in the patients with ovarian enlargement, including detection of early-stage cancers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 To date, there has been very limited analyses of RhoGDI2 protein expression in ovarian cancer and no studies of functional relevance. 15,16,25 Our RhoGDI2 shRNA suppression studies in the HeyA8 ovarian carcinoma cell line demonstrated that suppression of RhoGDI2 expression was associated with increased anchorageindependent growth, Matrigel invasion and lung colony metastatic tumor formation. However, our IHC analyses found that RhoGDI2 was significantly overexpressed in high-grade compared with low-grade ovarian cancers, that RhoGDI2 expression correlated with histological subtype of cancer, and no statistically significant association with survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…9 To date, there has been very limited analyses of RhoGDI2 protein expression in ovarian cancer and no studies of functional relevance. 15,16,25 Our RhoGDI2 shRNA suppression studies in the HeyA8 ovarian carcinoma cell line demonstrated that suppression of RhoGDI2 expression was associated with increased anchorageindependent growth, Matrigel invasion and lung colony metastatic tumor formation. However, our IHC analyses found that RhoGDI2 was significantly overexpressed in high-grade compared with low-grade ovarian cancers, that RhoGDI2 expression correlated with histological subtype of cancer, and no statistically significant association with survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Alternative methods are being developed for patients who have normal CA-125 levels but are suspected to having recurrent disease based on clinical symptoms [5]. These methods include other potential biomarkers, the most promising being human epydidimus protein 4 (HE4), [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] despite detection rates of 50–60% in early stage ovarian cancer. A comprehensive study comparing the sensitivity of ovarian cancer biomarkers to discriminate between benign and malignant masses has been described [11] as well as the role of molecular markers in prognosis and therapy reviewed in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other specific patient cohort studies showed interesting results in which ovarian endometrioma and pelvic inflammatory disease were associated with ovarian cancer risk (Kobayashi et al, 2007;Lin et al, 2011), but they were insufficient in terms of how they controlled confounding factors, as these were also based on hospital records or health insurance claims data. Among these previous studies, only four considered the differences among cancer cases, benign tumor cases and controls (Kim et al, 2009;Xie et al, 2004;Zhen et al, 2010;Zou et al, 2010). Moreover, they all had small sample sizes that were under 150.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%