2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.083001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lyapunov indices with two nearby trajectories in a curved spacetime

Abstract: We compare three methods for computing invariant Lyapunov exponents (LEs) in general relativity. They involve the geodesic deviation vector technique (M1), the two-nearby-orbits method with projection operations and with coordinate time as an independent variable (M2), and the two-nearby-orbits method without projection operations and with proper time as an independent variable (M3). An analysis indicates that M1 and M3 do not need any projection operation. In general, the values of LEs from the three methods … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that geodesic motion in MSM background exhibits chaotic behavior was shown in [31][32][33] mainly by studying Poincaré sections, but also by applying the FLI indicator [19] as defined in [16], and by the means of frequency analysis [33].…”
Section: Geodesic and Geodesic Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that geodesic motion in MSM background exhibits chaotic behavior was shown in [31][32][33] mainly by studying Poincaré sections, but also by applying the FLI indicator [19] as defined in [16], and by the means of frequency analysis [33].…”
Section: Geodesic and Geodesic Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11), (15), we have to ensure that ξ α and Dξ α dτ will remain spacelike. The prescription for this [15,16] is to choose initial conditions for ξ α , Dξ α dτ such that…”
Section: Chaotic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[32] for a discussion in the context of general relativity). Non-minimal coupling contributes to this through F µ -dependent terms.…”
Section: World-line Deviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%