2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1560354718070079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lyapunov Analysis of Strange Pseudohyperbolic Attractors: Angles Between Tangent Subspaces, Local Volume Expansion and Contraction

Abstract: Pseudohyperbolic attractors are genuine strange chaotic attractors. They do not contain stable periodic orbits and are robust in a sense that such orbits do not appear under variations. The tangent space of these attractors is split into a direct sum of volume expanding and contracting subspaces and these subspaces never have tangencies with each other. Any contraction in the first subspace, if occur, is weaker than contractions in the second one. In this paper we analyze local structure of several chaotic att… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the system does not have regions where we have return of skill: if, instead we plot the daily averages of the largest covariant or backward FTLE we find a broad distribution with exclusively positive support (not shown). Note that the problem of assessing whether a system is uniformly hyperbolic is usually addressed by studying whether the unstable and stable tangent spaces have tangencies (see e.g.. Ginelli et al 2007;Kuptsov and Kuznetsov 2018). We will address this matter using the formalism of UPOs, see Sect.…”
Section: Dynamical Heterogeneity Of the Attractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the system does not have regions where we have return of skill: if, instead we plot the daily averages of the largest covariant or backward FTLE we find a broad distribution with exclusively positive support (not shown). Note that the problem of assessing whether a system is uniformly hyperbolic is usually addressed by studying whether the unstable and stable tangent spaces have tangencies (see e.g.. Ginelli et al 2007;Kuptsov and Kuznetsov 2018). We will address this matter using the formalism of UPOs, see Sect.…”
Section: Dynamical Heterogeneity Of the Attractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the problem of assessing whether a system is uniformly hyperbolic is usually addressed by studying whether the unstable and stable tangent spaces have tangencies (see e.g.. Ginelli et al 2007;Kuptsov and Kuznetsov 2018). We will address this matter using the formalism of UPOs, see Sect We can better appreciate how heterogeneous the tangent space is by noting -see Fig.…”
Section: Dynamical Heterogeneity Of the Attractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the FTCLEs give the relative growth and decay rates of tangent vectors to the subspaces, the angle between the CLVs (otherwise known as alignment) gives an idea of transversality of the subspaces (Kuptsov and Kuznetsov 2018). High alignment of CLVs, or a vanishing angle between subspaces, has been suggested to be an indicator of transitions and catastrophic events (Beims and Gallas 2016;Sharafi et al 2017).…”
Section: B Alignment Of Clvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to the atmospheric circulation in the Atlantic sector, the FEM-BV-VAR method yields a set of states consistent with differing phases of the NAO. By treating the clustering as a non-smooth linear delay system, it is possible to directly compute the Lyapunov spectrum and CLVs of the model, as well as dynamical indicators of transitions such as increased finite-time instability (Norwood et al 2013) and alignment of CLVs (Beims and Gallas 2016;Sharafi et al 2017;Kuptsov and Kuznetsov 2018). The relationship between these dynamical quantities and the particular regime transitions can then be compared to assess whether the reduced-order model exhibits non-trivial dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%