1968
DOI: 10.1177/000348946807700408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LVI Assessment of the Newer Tests of Auditory Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, which used electroencephalography, patients with sensorineural hearing loss exhibited larger amplitude of responses at the threshold level, with greater increase as a function of stimulus intensity than in healthy hearing subjects [2], a finding consistent with our results.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a previous study, which used electroencephalography, patients with sensorineural hearing loss exhibited larger amplitude of responses at the threshold level, with greater increase as a function of stimulus intensity than in healthy hearing subjects [2], a finding consistent with our results.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Together with an earlier CAEP amplitude saturation, a steeper growth curve is evident in hearing-impaired individuals as well when comparing to normal-hearing individuals (Cody et al, 1968;Morita et al, 2003). Both effects might be explained by an enhanced activation of the auditory cortex.…”
Section: Caep Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In order to differentiate the hearing disorders, some studies have been done for several years, in which normal and impaired subjects were compared for the intensity-function curve and amplitude or latency of the evoked responses (Knight and Beagley 1969;Townsend and Cody 1970;Kollar 1971). Previously, as Cody et al (1968) described, the author also found that, in unilateral cochlear disorders, the threshold of AER of the impaired Fig. 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%