2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(00)00457-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LVAD treated heart recipients do not have deleterious HLA antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 And in yet another study, rejection rates were significantly lower in LVAD-bridged recipients than in patients who did not require mechanical support before heart transplantation. 3 Although PRA Ն10% has been previously identified as a risk factor for rejection after transplantation, it is possible that improved immunosuppression strategies have reduced the risk of rejection associated with preoperative sensitization. 8 In the most recent report of the ISHLT, PRA Ͼ10% was found to be a significant risk factor for 1-year mortality after adult heart transplant in the years 1995 to 1998 (odds ratio 1.25, p ϭ 0.03), but not from 1999 to June 2001 (odds ratio 1.26, p ϭ 0.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 And in yet another study, rejection rates were significantly lower in LVAD-bridged recipients than in patients who did not require mechanical support before heart transplantation. 3 Although PRA Ն10% has been previously identified as a risk factor for rejection after transplantation, it is possible that improved immunosuppression strategies have reduced the risk of rejection associated with preoperative sensitization. 8 In the most recent report of the ISHLT, PRA Ͼ10% was found to be a significant risk factor for 1-year mortality after adult heart transplant in the years 1995 to 1998 (odds ratio 1.25, p ϭ 0.03), but not from 1999 to June 2001 (odds ratio 1.26, p ϭ 0.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of patients, previously unsensitized, who develop anti-HLA antibodies during VAD support ranges from 14% to 66% in different series. 1,[3][4][5][6][7] The significance of this after transplantation is less clear. It has been demonstrated that an elevated PRA results in reduced long-term survival and increased incidence of acute and chronic rejection after transplantation, with the threshold for sensitization being a PRA of more than 10% in one landmark study 8 and more than 25% in another.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implantation of certain assist devices has been associated with many systemic irregularities including defects in coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades, infections (bacterial and fungal), decreased and TH-2 skewed T-cell responses, increased B-cell numbers and production of IgG, and higher serum levels of inflammatory molecules [3-6]. Implantation has also been associated with allosensitization to HLA antigens, presumably due to transfused blood products [7-10], although some reports have suggested alternative mechanisms [11-13]. Allosensitization may greatly increase the wait time for a compatible graft, and the odds of an antibody-mediated rejection episode after transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%