2015
DOI: 10.22215/timreview913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luxury and Creativity: Exploration, Exploitation, or Preservation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In luxury industries, innovations take the form of design processes that manifest into new products, services, and experiences, but also new organizational processes, such as novel marketing strategies. In certain scenarios, innovation is visible to customers, as in the case of haute couture and luxury cars, which are luxury objects associated with high levels of creativity (Roberts & Armitage, 2015). At other times, innovation is visible only from the inside of organizations, as some luxury objects are attractive to customers precisely because they remain unchanged or uncreative, hence exhibiting low levels of creativity (Roberts & Armitage, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In luxury industries, innovations take the form of design processes that manifest into new products, services, and experiences, but also new organizational processes, such as novel marketing strategies. In certain scenarios, innovation is visible to customers, as in the case of haute couture and luxury cars, which are luxury objects associated with high levels of creativity (Roberts & Armitage, 2015). At other times, innovation is visible only from the inside of organizations, as some luxury objects are attractive to customers precisely because they remain unchanged or uncreative, hence exhibiting low levels of creativity (Roberts & Armitage, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These creative individuals are guardians of the brand identity and designers of the brand future. As part of an organization, they do not work alone, but with teams (Roberts & Armitage, 2015)-often from marketing and design functions-that should be capable of understanding and sharing the brand tradition. However, marketing and design functions have opposite responsibilities with respect to tradition, and these can hinder their capacity to cooperate in innovation projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These tensions are particularly strong in specific industries, such as in the luxury goods industry, as Roberts and Armitage (2015) emphasize in their article in this issue. Because of the volatile and dynamic nature of the environment, firms must navigate through contradictory requirements and develop organizational solutions and innovative practices to survive and prosper (Eikhof & Haunschild, 2007;Lampel & Shamsie, 2000).…”
Section: Patrick Cohendet and Laurent Simonmentioning
confidence: 98%