2014
DOI: 10.1093/jcs/cst133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lutheranism and the Nordic Welfare States in Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, recent literature on the role of Protestantism and the welfare state in Nordic countries has challenged the claim that religion has not played a role in the historical and political process of welfare state development. As Markkola and Naumann (2014) underline, historical studies provide evidence that, in these countries, Churches and other religiously-affiliated actors were actively involved in welfare provision, thereby helping to shape key welfare debates (see also Backstrom et al, 2010Backstrom et al, , 2011; Journal of Church and State, 2014).…”
Section: Political Parties Religion and The Welfare Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, recent literature on the role of Protestantism and the welfare state in Nordic countries has challenged the claim that religion has not played a role in the historical and political process of welfare state development. As Markkola and Naumann (2014) underline, historical studies provide evidence that, in these countries, Churches and other religiously-affiliated actors were actively involved in welfare provision, thereby helping to shape key welfare debates (see also Backstrom et al, 2010Backstrom et al, , 2011; Journal of Church and State, 2014).…”
Section: Political Parties Religion and The Welfare Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interplay between political-institutional variables (electoral rules), political ones (the type of State-Church relationship), and cultural ones (the confessional monopoly in a given country) represent a useful analytical starting point for the study of social policy development and the role of religion. At the same time, we must keep in mind that analytical contributions in the literature based of past findings (such the limited role of Protestantism in Nordic countries or of religious organisations in majoritarian electoral systems) have to be constantly reassessed in light of new empirical research (see for example Markkola & Naumann, 2014;Quadagno & Rohlinger, 2009).…”
Section: Political Parties Religion and The Welfare Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, this is not the whole picture, because 4 Similar questions have been discussed in social sciences under the cleavage theory; see particularly Lipset & Rokkan 1967. For the usage of cleavage theory in studies in the Nordic Countries, see Markkola & Naumann 2014. …”
Section: Conclusion: the Limits Of The Power Of The Crownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most of these religion‐based analyses have been largely grounded in a macro‐scale perspective, giving relatively little place to domain‐specific examination. Since the impact of religion is not universal (Markkola & Naumann, ), such policy‐specific analysis can be of great value. This is especially the case in policy domains that do not directly involve class conflict and where historically religion had a say, making death‐related policy a leading candidate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%