Luther als Bibelübersetzer. Neue sprachwissenschaftliche Perspektiven für die Luther-Forschung

Ganslmayer, Christine

doi:10.1515/jbgsg-2018-0005

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12 The literature on Luther and the German language is nearly impossible to master completely. Most important for German studies are (among others) the role of Luther's Bible translation in the development of German language and literature (Wolf 1980;, the putative role of linguistic geography in his translation (Besch 2001(Besch , 2008Haas 2017), Luther's rhetoric and style (Stolt 1980a(Stolt , 1980b(Stolt , 1981(Stolt , 1982(Stolt , 1983(Stolt , 1984Lobenstein-Reichmann 1998, 2004, 2014, 2018, 2021, 2022, his understanding of language and his comments on the language used in his Bible translation (Beutel 1991;Lobenstein-Reichmann 2021), his translation practice (Ebeling 1951;Reinitzer 1983Reinitzer , 1985zur Mühlen 1978;Erben 1985;Redzich 2005Redzich , 2017Ganslmayr 2018;Ganslmayr and Karner 2021), his principles of communication (Gardt 1992), his participation in the linguistic discourse of his time (Sonderegger 1998;Musseleck 1981;Reichmann 2011), and his revision work (Tschirch 1966a;1966b;Sauer-Geppert 1982) and its continuation in the course of the following centuries (Gelhaus 1989;Wolf 2017). 13 "Vater der deutschen Sprache."…”

Section: Luther and The German Language: Inventor And Reformer?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast to Luther’s translation, however, these translations were not part of a Reformation movement and thus part of an influential public discourse. Their communicative function was quite different, intended more as aids for those reading and interpreting the Vulgate in Latin, and hence more or less focused on the Latin source language and committed to translating word for word (cf., on the translation principles followed, Gardt 1992, and especially Ganslmayer 2018; Ganslmayer and Karner 2021; Lobenstein-Reichmann 2021). The September Testament included only the New Testament and was therefore not the first full German Bible.…”

Section: Luther and The Biblementioning

confidence: 99%

“… 23. On Luther’s Bible translation, see Volz 1972; Blanke 2017, 298–305; on the revisions, see Sonderegger 1998; Jahr, Kähler, and Lesch 2019; a survey of research is provided by Ganslmayer 2018. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Luther’s Contribution as Bible Translator to the German Language

Lobenstein-Reichmann

2022

The Bible Translator

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Translation has often been the primary cultural medium through which history’s greatest visions for society have been communicated and acculturated. But few translations have had as much influence on German religion, politics, culture, and language as Luther’s Bible translation did. This article discusses Luther’s role as a reformer of language and as a Bible translator. Of course these two roles can scarcely be considered independently of each other. The Reformation was deeply marked by his translation choices, and his distinctive way of reading, interpreting, and communicating the Bible’s meaning.

show abstract

Section: Luther and The German Language: Inventor And Reformer?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Luther and The Biblementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Luther’s Contribution as Bible Translator to the German Language

Lobenstein-Reichmann

2022

The Bible Translator

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Volkssprachliche Übersetzungen der Bibel im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Die Entstehung von Interpretationsvarianten der Heiligen Schrift und die Frage des Auslegungsmonopols der Kirche

Unterburger¹

2021

Veröffentlichungen Des Instituts Für Europäische Geschichte Mainz Beihefte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Volkssprachliche Übersetzungen der Bibel im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert Die Entstehung von Interpretationsvarianten der Heiligen Schrift und die Frage des Auslegungsmonopols der Kirche Im Decretum Gratiani, neben den Sentenzen des Petrus Lombardus und nach der Heiligen Schrift die wichtigste Textsammlung des Mittelalters auch für die Theologie, findet sich die vieltraktierte Frage zu Beginn der distinctio 20: Wer hat mehr Autorität: Die Theologen, also die Ausleger der Heiligen Schrift, oder die Päpste, die jurisdiktionelle Entscheidungen treffen? Scheinbar haben diejenigen größere Autorität, die sich auf mehr Vernunft stützen können. Aber das eine ist es, so Gratian, Rechtsfälle zu entscheiden, das andere, die heiligen Schriften sorgfältig auszulegen. In der Schriftauslegung haben die Theologen den Vorrang; beim Fällen von Entscheidungen die Päpste 1 . Das Verhältnis von theologischem und pastoralem Lehramt wurde das ganze Mittelalter hindurch hiervon ausgehend kontrovers diskutiert 2 . Im 16. Jahrhundert jedoch ist es 1 »Quo enim quisque magis ratione nititur, eo maioris auctoritatis eius uerba esse uidentur.Plurimi autem tractatorum, sicut pleniori gratia Spiritus sancti, ita ampliori scientia aliis precellentes, rationi magis adhesisse probantur. Unde nonnullorum Pontificum constitutis Augustini, Ieronimi atque aliorum tractatorum dicta eis uidentur esse preferenda. Sed aliud est causis terminum imponere aliud scripturas sacras diligenter exponere. Negotiis diffiniendis non solum est necessaria scientia, sed etiam potestas. Unde Christus dicturus Petro: ›Quodcumque ligaueris super terram, erit ligatum et in celis, etc.‹ prius dedit sibi claues regni celorum: in altera dans ei scientiam discernendi inter lepram et lepram, in altera dans sibi potestatem eiciendi aliquos ab ecclesia, uel recipiendi. Cum ergo quelibet negotia finem accipiant uel in absolutione innocentium, uel in condempnatione delinquentium, absolutio uero uel condempnatio non scientiam tantum, sed etiam potestatem presidentium desiderant: aparet, quod diuinarum scripturarum tractatores, etsi Scientia Pontificibus premineant, tamen, quia dignitatis eorum apicem non sunt adepti, in sacrarum scripturarum expositionibus eis preponuntur, in causis uero diffiniendis secundum post eos locum merentur«:

show abstract

Martin Luther und die Veritas Graeca – Eine Positionsbestimmung

Förster

2020

Kerygma und Dogma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Luther als Bibelübersetzer. Neue sprachwissenschaftliche Perspektiven für die Luther-Forschung

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

Luther’s Contribution as Bible Translator to the German Language

Luther’s Contribution as Bible Translator to the German Language

Volkssprachliche Übersetzungen der Bibel im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Die Entstehung von Interpretationsvarianten der Heiligen Schrift und die Frage des Auslegungsmonopols der Kirche

Martin Luther und die Veritas Graeca – Eine Positionsbestimmung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About