2011
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.82351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luteinizing hormone and its dilemma in ovulation induction

Abstract: Concept of a ‘therapeutic window’ of luteinizing hormone (LH) for successful conception in assisted reproductive technology and ovulation induction has been reviewed in this literature. The separate but complementary roles of follicle stimulating hormone and LH in stimulating folliculogenesis and ovulation are well established. Levels under which low LH concentrations may be equally or suboptimally needed for oocyte quality and subsequent embryonic development competence has been reviewed along with the data r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Published evidence suggesting that high levels of LH can lead to follicular atresia and spontaneous abortion (Howles et al, 1986;Stanger and Yovich, 1985) has led to the concept of a 'therapeutic window' for LH to stimulate optimal oestradiol production and promote success in assisted reproduction techniques and ovulation induction (Kumar and Sait, 2011;Shoham, 2002). The primary end-point of the current study suggests that both regimens are within the LH therapeutic Table 3 Treatment outcomes for patients receiving recombinant human folliclestimulating hormone (rhFSH) plus recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH ) (2:1) from stimulation day 1 (group A), or rhFSH from days 1-5, then rhFSH plus rhLH (2:1) from day 6 (group B) (secondary end-points; modified intention-to-treat population unless otherwise specified).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Published evidence suggesting that high levels of LH can lead to follicular atresia and spontaneous abortion (Howles et al, 1986;Stanger and Yovich, 1985) has led to the concept of a 'therapeutic window' for LH to stimulate optimal oestradiol production and promote success in assisted reproduction techniques and ovulation induction (Kumar and Sait, 2011;Shoham, 2002). The primary end-point of the current study suggests that both regimens are within the LH therapeutic Table 3 Treatment outcomes for patients receiving recombinant human folliclestimulating hormone (rhFSH) plus recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH ) (2:1) from stimulation day 1 (group A), or rhFSH from days 1-5, then rhFSH plus rhLH (2:1) from day 6 (group B) (secondary end-points; modified intention-to-treat population unless otherwise specified).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Contrary, high LH activities cause binding of granulosa cells followed by follicles luteinisation and receptor down regulation leading untimely premature ovulations [40,44] and the transport of the gametes to fertilization site are associated with problems [45]. On the other side, low LH activities cause deviation in oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryonic development [46]. However, not only, FSH:LH ratio could be affecting the ovarian response and embryos quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of both premature LH rise (≥10 mIU/mL) and premature progesterone rise (variable cut-off values ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 ng/mL) is indicative of a premature LH surge [20]. Premature LH rise results in acquiring of LH receptors by the granulosa cells with early luteinization and follicular atresia [21]. Premature progesterone rise causes premature transformation of the endometrium into secretory one resulting in an asynchrony between the endometrium and the embryos transferred to it with reduction in pregnancy rates [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%