2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-4924-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luteal phase serum cell-free DNA as a marker of failed pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology

Abstract: Purpose : DNA-damaging factors have been reported in patients that failed to achieve pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The hypothesis was that increased circulating cell-free DNA released by damaged cells could predict unfavorable conditions leading to failed ART treatment. The objective was to compare the relative concentrations of cell-free DNA in the luteal phase sera of nonpregnant versus pregnant patients. Methods : Frozen-thawed sera (30 IVF cases) were obtained 1 week after embry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study found that women who did not conceive during the IVF cycle had statistically significantly higher mean concentrations of cfDNA 14 days after embryo transfer, during the bHCG blood test, compared with women who did conceive. A previous study did not find a statistically significant difference in cfDNA concentrations comparing women who conceived in IVF treatment and those who did not (Hart et al, 2005). The difference between that study and the current study could be explained in two ways.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study found that women who did not conceive during the IVF cycle had statistically significantly higher mean concentrations of cfDNA 14 days after embryo transfer, during the bHCG blood test, compared with women who did conceive. A previous study did not find a statistically significant difference in cfDNA concentrations comparing women who conceived in IVF treatment and those who did not (Hart et al, 2005). The difference between that study and the current study could be explained in two ways.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The difference between that study and the current study could be explained in two ways. First, the study by Hart et al (2005) was conducted using capillary electrophoresis to measure cfDNA concentrations, a method which may be less sensitive in identifying fragments of cfDNA; as described, the minimal cfDNA molecular weight was 1 Kb. Second, the determination of cfDNA by Hart et al (2005) was 1 week after embryo transfer, rather than 2 weeks in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no relationship was found between CFD levels in sera and conception rates in IVF patients in serum taken 1 week after embryo transfer [15].…”
Section: Cell-free Dnamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Serum cf-DNA has been proposed as a marker of semen quality, since it has been associated with important sperm parameters linked to normal sperm function [ 7 ]. It has been reported that there is no relationship between serum cf-DNA concentrations and IVF outcome in patients undergoing IVF-ET treatments [ 8 ], while a more recent report indicated that increased serum cell-free DNA is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing IVF-ET programs [ 9 ]. Methods used for the analysis of serum cf-DNA are real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [ 3 , 10 ] and quantitative PCR [ 2 ], while relative recently a new simple and highly sensitive method known as the SYBR gold fluorescent-stained direct assay has been developed [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%